PDA

View Full Version : Wisconsin anti-union law on hold for two months or more



Roger Perry
04-01-2011, 05:42 PM
A Wisconsin law stripping most public employees of most of their collective bargaining is likely on hold for at least two months. Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi has extended a restraining order keeping the law from going into effect while she considers whether the state open meetings law was broken in the process of passing the law.

http://www.gmtoday.com/

Straight from the horse's mouth--------

huntinman
04-01-2011, 05:53 PM
A Wisconsin law stripping most public employees of most of their collective bargaining is likely on hold for at least two months. Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi has extended a restraining order keeping the law from going into effect while she considers whether the state open meetings law was broken in the process of passing the law.

http://www.gmtoday.com/

Straight from the horse's mouth--------



Or straight from the horses a$$

luvmylabs23139
04-01-2011, 05:57 PM
The repubicans should stop wasting time and just pass the whole darn thing again. That would stop that activist judge dead in her tracks.

Roger Perry
04-01-2011, 05:57 PM
Or straight from the horses a$$

I culd have posted the story from Capital hill Blue but took it directly from the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel website.;-) Looks like the Governor hit a big speed bump this time.:razz: But with nothing constructive to say you right back to name calling typical response.

luvmylabs23139
04-01-2011, 06:01 PM
Sumi , ironic name fo a judge, could have decided this case in a lot less time than she has spent issuing these orders. She is purposely delaying this and should be thrown off the bench.

Roger Perry
04-01-2011, 06:02 PM
The repubicans should stop wasting time and just pass the whole darn thing again. That would stop that activist judge dead in her tracks.

I would think they would now have to wait for a ruling. I have noticed that one of the main posters has been mum on the subject though.

luvmylabs23139
04-01-2011, 06:05 PM
I would think they would now have to wait for a ruling.

Nope, Sumi actually suggested they do just that days ago.:p

Franco
04-01-2011, 06:11 PM
One way to neutralize the activist judge is by firing a certain amount of state employess every week so that the state can still balance thier budget.

Accept the new law or else!

A judge circumventing the will of the voters is dangerous.

Nor_Cal_Angler
04-01-2011, 09:16 PM
One way to neutralize the activist judge is by firing a certain amount of state employess every week so that the state can still balance thier budget.

Accept the new law or else!

A judge circumventing the will of the voters is dangerous.

Nawwwww....nothing to worry about...nothing to see here...move along, move along....

Will of the voters in California regards,

NCA

Buzz
04-01-2011, 09:55 PM
Sumi , ironic name fo a judge, could have decided this case in a lot less time than she has spent issuing these orders. She is purposely delaying this and should be thrown off the bench.

Sumi. I think she must be a Finnlander.

This must be pretty infuriating to conservatives, judicial sand in the gears of the machine.

Roger Perry
04-02-2011, 10:22 AM
RK, seeing as how you pointed out to us that you are the closest to the source of news there, could you give us an update on what's going on there????

Uncle Bill
04-02-2011, 11:35 AM
Sumi. I think she must be a Finnlander.

This must be pretty infuriating to conservatives, judicial sand in the gears of the machine.

What's truly sad, Buzz, is that it apparently ISN"T infuriating to ALL AMERICANS. If you can't see what this judge with a unionist agenda is doing to shame the bench she is sitting on, YOU and rest of the Roger loons are to be pitied.

UB

luvmylabs23139
04-02-2011, 11:51 AM
Sumi. I think she must be a Finnlander.

This must be pretty infuriating to conservatives, judicial sand in the gears of the machine.

So a judge should refuse to uphold the law and the constitution because she has personal digusting views that are in direct contrast to the constitution?
She should be hung fom the nearest tree today!!!!

Roger Perry
04-02-2011, 11:52 AM
Are your eyes brown??
Or have you spewed so much bull shat that you are a quart low??
You are not worth talking to.



RK

:BIG::BIG::grab:

road kill
04-02-2011, 11:52 AM
So a judge should refuse to uphold the law and the constitution because she has personal digusting views that are in direct contrast to the constitution?
She should be hung fom the nearest tree today!!!!

Oh.....and her HUSBAND & SON work for the union and Democrats party???

No conflict here.
__________________________________________________ _________________
"Judge Sumi's personal bias
Ethel C. Fenig
Well, well, well! What a surprise. Not! The blog Freedom Eden has discovered some interesting personal background on Wisconsin's Judge Maryann Sumi, the very judge who issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Wisconsin Secretary of State Doug La Follette from publishing Act 10, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's (R) law limiting collective bargaining for state employees.

Judge Sumi has a son, Jake Sinderbrand. And Sinderbrand works for...the AFL-CIO and the SEIU: The very unions which would be adversely affected by the law. Naturally, Sinderbrand doesn't think much of Walker, "I wonder how this guy passed kindergarten math" is one of the kindest comments on his facebook page.

So, following the example of those screeching liberals demanding that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas remove himself from trials on the legality of Obamacare because of his wife's opposition to it, shouldn't Judge Sumi excuse herself from the decision? Sumi's son is much more involved with the case than Thomas' wife.

Just askin'............."
__________________________________________________ ____________________

"Judge Sumi’s Husband Donated to Three of Badger 14(the FleeBaggers)
by Media Trackers
There was already cause for Judge Maryann Sumi to have recused herself in the collective bargaining lawsuit since her son, Jake Sinderbrand is a former employee of the AFL-CIO and SEIU, now more conflict of interests have been discovered.



Judge Sumi’s husband, Carl Sinderbrand donated to the campaigns of three of the “Badger 14″: Dave Hansen, Jim Holperin and Robert Wirch. Additionally Sinderbrand donated to Tom Barrett in his fight against Scott Walker for the governorship.

Judge Sumi’s family has a history of strong ties to unions and a pattern of financially supporting only democratic candidates. This is not the impartiality Wisconsin deserves on the bench."
__________________________________________________ ____________________________







RK

huntinman
04-02-2011, 02:50 PM
Sumi. I think she must be a Finnlander.

This must be pretty infuriating to conservatives, judicial sand in the gears of the machine.

If so, she lost one of her "M"'s

Eric Johnson
04-02-2011, 04:32 PM
So a judge should refuse to uphold the law and the constitution because she has personal digusting views that are in direct contrast to the constitution?
She should be hung fom the nearest tree today!!!!

No. She should have recused herself if there was a breach of ethics. That too would be upholding the law.

Eric

Roger Perry
04-07-2011, 12:01 PM
La Follette wants appeal in collective bargaining case dropped
9:14 a.m.
MADISON (AP) - Secretary of State Doug La Follette is asking the Wisconsin Supreme Court to drop the appeal made in his name of a judge’s order putting on hold the enactment of the law restricting union bargaining powers.
La Follette asked the high court on Wednesday to withdraw the appeal which had been made in his name by the state Department of Justice. La Follette has since gotten his own attorney because he said he disagreed with the position taken by DOJ and he opposes the law.
The Supreme Court has yet to say whether it will take the appeal, which seeks to undo a judge’s ordering barring La Follette from publishing the law and allowing it to take effect.
A spokesman for DOJ declined to comment.
http://www.gmtoday.com/ten_things/main.asp#16

badbullgator
04-08-2011, 11:22 AM
So a judge should refuse to uphold the law and the constitution because she has personal digusting views that are in direct contrast to the constitution?
She should be hung fom the nearest tree today!!!!


Well didn't obungalo just tell the DOJ not to enforce the gay marrage laws?

luvmylabs23139
04-08-2011, 11:30 AM
Well didn't obungalo just tell the DOJ not to enforce the gay marrage laws?

MY point. OBUMMA and his AG refuse to uphold the constitution.


TREASON comes to mind.

road kill
04-08-2011, 11:32 AM
RK, seeing as how you pointed out to us that you are the closest to the source of news there, could you give us an update on what's going on there????

Going pretty well Roger, thanks for asking!!!:cool:



RK

Roger Perry
04-08-2011, 11:34 AM
MY point. OBUMMA and his AG refuse to uphold the constitution.


TREASON comes to mind.

Did you feel the same way when Bush did not uphold the constitution?????????? Treason???????????

huntinman
04-08-2011, 11:38 AM
Roger lets talk about the WI Supreme Court race...;)

luvmylabs23139
04-08-2011, 11:49 AM
Did you feel the same way when Bush did not uphold the constitution?????????? Treason???????????


Unlike you I do not live in the past. Whether that be in reference to the POTUS or the labradors I have been privelaged to share my life with.
Those that pass are treated with respect and dignity not driven around in the car.:rolleyes:

M&K's Retrievers
04-08-2011, 12:05 PM
One way to neutralize the activist judge is by firing a certain amount of state employess every week so that the state can still balance thier budget.

Accept the new law or else!

A judge circumventing the will of the voters is dangerous.

If you check I think you will find out that you cannot fire a State or Federal employee for any reason.

road kill
04-08-2011, 12:08 PM
Did you feel the same way when Bush did not uphold the constitution?????????? Treason???????????

Man Crush!!!:shock:


RK

Roger Perry
04-08-2011, 12:50 PM
Man Crush!!!:shock:


RK

And you take offense at being called a teabagger? Of course that is in the political term because this is a political forum.