PDA

View Full Version : A True American Hero!!!!



road kill
04-09-2011, 05:44 PM
John Boehner Closes the Deal to Avoid Government Shutdown!!

JOHN BRESNAHAN & JAKE SHERMAN | 4/9/11 2:35 AM EDT
They gathered in HC-5 all week talking — sometimes complaining loudly — about where the party was headed in the budget crisis. Many said House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) didn’t share enough information. Others were peeved he wasn’t pushing for deep enough cuts. Some were ready for a government shutdown.

And on Friday night, Boehner himself was unsure what would happen. Halfway through a closed-door meeting of House Republicans, an aide approached Boehner, slipped him a piece a paper, which he read and quickly pocketed.

He then stepped to the podium, and announced what everyone had been waiting for.

“We have a deal,” the Ohio Republican said around 10:30 p.m.

And with that, Boehner had something more — a defining moment in his speakership and a chance to set aside questions about his ability to manage an unwieldy caucus of conservatives, at least for now.

The 61-year-old, swept into the speaker’s chair during last November’s GOP landslide, faced down two Democrats — Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) — and answered doubts from the conservative movement about whether he was a true believer.

His colleagues stood and cheered at his announcement of a deal, knowing Boehner secured more than $38.5 billion in cuts, a far higher figure than many of them expected just days before. Boehner still has to get the votes next week for the long-term budget deal, and he’s got a huge sales job ahead on raising the debt limit, not to mention debating the entire 2012 budget.

“It’s a big deal. It shows a great deal of leadership,” said Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.), a Boehner ally. “It’s a big win for the speaker.”

In a larger sense, Boehner has achieved more than just a short-term budget victory — in his first three months as speaker, he’s helped turn the entire Washington dialogue into a debate about the size and scope of government. He started the year by getting rid of earmarks, he’s pushing through some of the deepest spending cuts in American history, and he’ll now try to get most of the GOP Conference on board with Rep. Paul Ryan’s fiscal 2012 budget — one of the most audacious long-term spending plans in recent memory.

All this came together from a politician who was kicked out of leadership 12 years ago and came to the speaker’s job with serious question marks from the right about how he would go about dealmaking with a Democratic president while corralling the 87-strong group of GOP freshmen



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/52853.html#ixzz1J4JAzmHk
_______________________________________________

What a great week for America!!
First the HUGE WI VICTORY, now this!!!:D


RK

Roger Perry
04-09-2011, 06:06 PM
If the Republicans had not tried to put their abortion agenda ahead of agreeing on a budget there would have been an agreement long before just minutes before midnight and almost shutting down the government.

As far as your other "big victory" in Wisconsin Prosser was supposed to have won in a landslide. That didn't happen did it????????????

MADISON, Wis. – Wisconsin voters sent Republican Gov. Scott Walker a clear message about their unhappiness with his muscling through a law restricting union rights by sending a once runaway state Supreme Court race toward a near-certain recount and filling the governor's former post with a Democrat.

"This continues to add fuel to the tremendous fire of enthusiasm and passion to recall the Republican senators that support Scott Walker's backwards priorities for the state," Wisconsin Democratic Party chairman Mike Tate said of the election results.

Justice David Prosser won a nonpartisan, four-way primary with 55 percent of the vote. The general election was expected to be a runaway after second-place finisher JoAnne Kloppenburg got half as many votes.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110406/ap_on_re_us/us_wisconsin_supreme_court_election

Even though Kloppenburg lost the election, the people of Wisconsin have shown their displeasure with Governor Walker through the number of votes Kloppenburg received. So go ahead and strut your stuff, Prosser was supposed to win by a landslide and almost lost the election. Gave you a scare on Wednsday though didn't it. ;-)

road kill
04-09-2011, 06:16 PM
If the Republicans had not tried to put their abortion agenda ahead of agreeing on a budget there would have been an agreement long before just minutes before midnight and almost shutting down the government.

As far as your other "big victory" in Wisconsin Prosser was supposed to have won in a landslide. That didn't happen did it????????????

MADISON, Wis. – Wisconsin voters sent Republican Gov. Scott Walker a clear message about their unhappiness with his muscling through a law restricting union rights by sending a once runaway state Supreme Court race toward a near-certain recount and filling the governor's former post with a Democrat.

"This continues to add fuel to the tremendous fire of enthusiasm and passion to recall the Republican senators that support Scott Walker's backwards priorities for the state," Wisconsin Democratic Party chairman Mike Tate said of the election results.

Justice David Prosser won a nonpartisan, four-way primary with 55 percent of the vote. The general election was expected to be a runaway after second-place finisher JoAnne Kloppenburg got half as many votes.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110406/ap_on_re_us/us_wisconsin_supreme_court_election

Even though Kloppenburg lost the election, the people of Wisconsin have shown their displeasure with Governor Walker through the number of votes Kloppenburg received. So go ahead and strut your stuff, Prosser was supposed to win by a landslide and almost lost the election. Gave you a scare on Wednsday though didn't it. ;-)

You progressive KLOWNS threw everything you had at Prosser.
YOU posted it!!!
How every body in the state was against Walker.
Over and over YOU posted links about it!!!

How does CROW taste Roger??


YOU WERE WRONG!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


RK

Roger Perry
04-09-2011, 06:31 PM
You progressive KLOWNS threw everything you had at Prosser.
YOU posted it!!!
How every body in the state was against Walker.
Over and over YOU posted links about it!!!

How does CROW taste Roger??


YOU WERE WRONG!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


RK
What part of Prosser was supposed to win by a landslide don't you understand??????????? He almost lost the election. The people of Wisconsin have spoken. They do not agree with what Walker is trying to do there. Walker won the Governor's election by just 52% of the vote not a big margin was it. Now 60% of the people do not like the job he is doing there. If the election was held again it is very doubtful he would win. He will never be a 2 term Governor. If 60% of the people do not like him after 2 months in office he will be less popular than Bush if he last 4 years without being recalled.

Rasmussen Poll: Almost Six In Ten Wisconsin Voters Disapprove Of Gov. Walker

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's efforts to strip public employee unions of most of their collective bargaining rights appears to be so unpopular, that a Rasmussen poll (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_state_surveys/wisconsin/wisconsin_governor_walker_43_approval_rating) now finds that almost 60% of likely Wisconsin voters disapprove of his job performance.
That finding shows just how quickly Walker -- who was elected to his first term last November with 52% of the vote -- has sunk just in his first two months in office. And it comes one day after Rasmussen released results from the same poll, all of which showed public opinion firmly on the side of the unions in the labor rights battle that has deadlocked the state capitol for the past few weeks.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/rasmussen-poll-almost-six-in-ten-wisconsin-voters-disapprove-of-gov-walker.php

road kill
04-09-2011, 06:36 PM
What part of Prosser was supposed to win by a landslide don't you understand??????????? He almost lost the election. The people of Wisconsin have spoken. They do not agree with what Walker is trying to do there. Walker won the Governor's election by just 52% of the vote not a big margin was it. Now 60% of the people do not like the job he is doing there. If the election was held again it is very doubtful he would win. He will never be a 2 term Governor. If 60% of the people do not like him after 2 months in office he will be less popular than Bush if he last 4 years without being recalled.

Rasmussen Poll: Almost Six In Ten Wisconsin Voters Disapprove Of Gov. Walker

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's efforts to strip public employee unions of most of their collective bargaining rights appears to be so unpopular, that a Rasmussen poll (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_state_surveys/wisconsin/wisconsin_governor_walker_43_approval_rating) now finds that almost 60% of likely Wisconsin voters disapprove of his job performance.
That finding shows just how quickly Walker -- who was elected to his first term last November with 52% of the vote -- has sunk just in his first two months in office. And it comes one day after Rasmussen released results from the same poll, all of which showed public opinion firmly on the side of the unions in the labor rights battle that has deadlocked the state capitol for the past few weeks.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/rasmussen-poll-almost-six-in-ten-wisconsin-voters-disapprove-of-gov-walker.php

WTH Roger, you progressives even sent Michael Moore, Richard Trumka and Jesse Jackson to Madison.:shock:



NUFF SAID...........

RK

huntinman
04-09-2011, 08:57 PM
What part of Prosser was supposed to win by a landslide don't you understand??????????? He almost lost the election. The people of Wisconsin have spoken. They do not agree with what Walker is trying to do there. Walker won the Governor's election by just 52% of the vote not a big margin was it. Now 60% of the people do not like the job he is doing there. If the election was held again it is very doubtful he would win. He will never be a 2 term Governor. If 60% of the people do not like him after 2 months in office he will be less popular than Bush if he last 4 years without being recalled.

Rasmussen Poll: Almost Six In Ten Wisconsin Voters Disapprove Of Gov. Walker

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's efforts to strip public employee unions of most of their collective bargaining rights appears to be so unpopular, that a Rasmussen poll (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_state_surveys/wisconsin/wisconsin_governor_walker_43_approval_rating) now finds that almost 60% of likely Wisconsin voters disapprove of his job performance.
That finding shows just how quickly Walker -- who was elected to his first term last November with 52% of the vote -- has sunk just in his first two months in office. And it comes one day after Rasmussen released results from the same poll, all of which showed public opinion firmly on the side of the unions in the labor rights battle that has deadlocked the state capitol for the past few weeks.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/rasmussen-poll-almost-six-in-ten-wisconsin-voters-disapprove-of-gov-walker.php

A win is a win Roger.... you were bragging that your lib lady had a 40... let me say that again 40 vote lead!! how does 7,000 sound to you? Put that in your bong and smoke it!

Roger Perry
04-09-2011, 09:51 PM
A win is a win Roger.... you were bragging that your lib lady had a 40... let me say that again 40 vote lead!! how does 7,000 sound to you? Put that in your bong and smoke it!

Ok little RK. I still say the people of Wisconsin spoke because she was supposed to lose by a landslide and almost won the election. I hope the American people take notice of what is happening in Wisconsin. 60% of the people of Wisconsin are now against Walker. He would not win an election if it were reheld today. He will not win a 2nd term and will probably be recalled once he has a year in office when it is legal to do so.;-)

Losthwy
04-09-2011, 10:54 PM
John Boehner is a hero???????? Nice tan though.

Nor_Cal_Angler
04-09-2011, 11:47 PM
If the Republicans had not tried to put their abortion agenda ahead of agreeing on a budget there would have been an agreement long before just minutes before midnight and almost shutting down the government.
As far as your other "big victory" in Wisconsin Prosser was supposed to have won in a landslide. That didn't happen did it????????????

MADISON, Wis. – Wisconsin voters sent Republican Gov. Scott Walker a clear message about their unhappiness with his muscling through a law restricting union rights by sending a once runaway state Supreme Court race toward a near-certain recount and filling the governor's former post with a Democrat.

"This continues to add fuel to the tremendous fire of enthusiasm and passion to recall the Republican senators that support Scott Walker's backwards priorities for the state," Wisconsin Democratic Party chairman Mike Tate said of the election results.

Justice David Prosser won a nonpartisan, four-way primary with 55 percent of the vote. The general election was expected to be a runaway after second-place finisher JoAnne Kloppenburg got half as many votes.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110406/ap_on_re_us/us_wisconsin_supreme_court_election

Even though Kloppenburg lost the election, the people of Wisconsin have shown their displeasure with Governor Walker through the number of votes Kloppenburg received. So go ahead and strut your stuff, Prosser was supposed to win by a landslide and almost lost the election. Gave you a scare on Wednsday though didn't it. ;-)

Good Lord....I am far to often suprised that no one points out the obvious sooner to some of the members here....sometimes I just enjoy sitting back and reading this stuff...

Roger....

Had your Liberal CONTROLLED CONGRESS, SENATE, and PRESIDENCY not passed the buck on down the road WAY WAY WAY WAY back when we would have had a budget done.....how did you say it...."long before just minutes before midnight and almost shutting down the government."

You can cite any source you want but the FACT is they missed the boat and screwed that one up...THEY LOST THE HOUSE...it wasnt the Republican attempts to defund Planned Parenthood that held up a budget. It was the fact that the Liberals didn't do what they should have and pass a budget for this physical year, and now they have to pay the price...

2012-13 physical year budget is gonna be a GOOD ONE.

CUT THAT SPENDING!!!!!!

Game set match.....

NCA

Franco
04-10-2011, 07:36 AM
His colleagues stood and cheered at his announcement of a deal, knowing Boehner secured more than $38.5 billion in cuts, a far higher figure than many of them expected just days before. Boehner still has to get the votes next week for the long-term budget deal, and he’s got a huge sales job ahead on raising the debt limit, not to mention debating the entire 2012 budget.





Am I reading this correctly? That Boehner supports raising the debt limit?
That has to be a typo, right?

The GOP might have a small victory here but, by adding abortion to the debate they will lose the war in 2012. How stupid could they be? They had the Dems beat over the economy, budget and deficit yet they just couldn't help themselves, they had to throw abortion into the debate. This isssue will rally the hardcore dems and moderates. There aren't enough anti-abortion votes to get the GOP within miles of the White House!

Bring on the Libetarians, they are the only ones serious about the budget and deficit. Ryan budget plan still leaves us with an estimated 10 TRILLION deficit while Paul's budget plan eliminates it in 5 to 6 years. Plus. unlike the GOP, the Libetarians are against big brother government!

Roger Perry
04-10-2011, 07:47 AM
"On the other side was a strong-willed Obama (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42509310/ns/politics-capitol_hill/#), who mostly succeeded in forcing Republicans to cave in on dozens of controversial conservative policy prescriptions — including rolling back environmental protections and cutting off Planned Parenthood from taxpayer assistance while protecting favored programs like education, clean energy and medical research.
It was, in short, the type of split-the-differences deal that a political scientist might have predicted from the start, given the realities of divided government.
Obama stood firm against GOP attempts to block the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to issue global warming rules and other reversals of environmental regulations. Obama's wins on the environment were matched by a bitter battle in which he said no way to GOP demands to cut off Planned Parenthood from federal help. The results, taken together, pleased core Democratic constituencies of environmentalists and women."

road kill
04-10-2011, 09:11 AM
Am I reading this correctly? That Boehner supports raising the debt limit?
That has to be a typo, right?

The GOP might have a small victory here but, by adding abortion to the debate they will lose the war in 2012. How stupid could they be? They had the Dems beat over the economy, budget and deficit yet they just couldn't help themselves, they had to throw abortion into the debate. This isssue will rally the hardcore dems and moderates. There aren't enough anti-abortion votes to get the GOP within miles of the White House!

Bring on the Libetarians, they are the only ones serious about the budget and deficit. Ryan budget plan still leaves us with an estimated 10 TRILLION deficit while Paul's budget plan eliminates it in 5 to 6 years. Plus. unlike the GOP, the Libetarians are against big brother government!


C'mon man.........

They did NOT throw abortion into the deal.
They added TAXPAYER FUNDED abortion into the deal.

Someone makes a mistake on a date last night and needs an abortion, well then I guess the progressive liberals say it's OK to kill the baby, but WE don't want to pay for it.

Please tell me you can see the difference.....PLEASE?????

Change is no longer coming.....it's happening!!!:D



RK

road kill
04-10-2011, 09:14 AM
"On the other side was a strong-willed Obama (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42509310/ns/politics-capitol_hill/#), who mostly succeeded in forcing Republicans to cave in on dozens of controversial conservative policy prescriptions — including rolling back environmental protections and cutting off Planned Parenthood from taxpayer assistance while protecting favored programs like education, clean energy and medical research.
It was, in short, the type of split-the-differences deal that a political scientist might have predicted from the start, given the realities of divided government.
Obama stood firm against GOP attempts to block the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to issue global warming rules and other reversals of environmental regulations. Obama's wins on the environment were matched by a bitter battle in which he said no way to GOP demands to cut off Planned Parenthood from federal help. The results, taken together, pleased core Democratic constituencies of environmentalists and women."

Roger, do you even read this crap before you post it?

Obama is a strong leader because he stands up for something that doesn't exist, but uses the US military as a political bargaining chip??

PATHETIC!!!!:(



RK

Roger Perry
04-10-2011, 09:20 AM
C'mon man.........

They did NOT throw abortion into the deal.
They added TAXPAYER FUNDED abortion into the deal.

Someone makes a mistake on a date last night and needs an abortion, well then I guess the progressive liberals say it's OK to kill the baby, but WE don't want to pay for it.

Please tell me you can see the difference.....PLEASE?????

Change is no longer coming.....it's happening!!!:D



RK

RK, what part of It’s also worth noting that federal law already forbids Planned Parenthood from using the funds it receives from the government for abortions Did you not understand:confused:

road kill
04-10-2011, 09:23 AM
RK, what part of It’s also worth noting that federal law already forbids Planned Parenthood from using the funds it receives from the government for abortions Did you not understand:confused:


You a luaghable.
There should be NO FEDERAL $$$'s anywhere near that place.
They perform abortions there.

Get a 4th grader to explain it to you.


RK

Roger Perry
04-10-2011, 09:28 AM
You a luaghable.
There should be NO FEDERAL $$$'s anywhere near that place.
They perform abortions there.

Get a 4th grader to explain it to you.


RK

What about all the other services Planned Prenthood offers??????? Hospitals also perform abortions so by your reasoning we should aslo get rid of hospitals.:rolleyes:

luvmylabs23139
04-10-2011, 09:31 AM
RK, what part of It’s also worth noting that federal law already forbids Planned Parenthood from using the funds it receives from the government for abortions Did you not understand:confused:


Roger,
Lets be real. I have a CPA and I can assure you that I know how to hide what money is actually being used for and know how to do it within the letter of the law.
It is more fun to use that knowledge to expose the abuses of the welfare slime and the DUMMOCRATS>

luvmylabs23139
04-10-2011, 09:36 AM
What about all the other services Planned Prenthood offers??????? Hospitals also perform abortions so by your reasoning we should aslo get rid of hospitals.:rolleyes:


THey mix the money and use taxpayer money for abortions. It is very simple to do.
NO taxpayer money should go to any private entity.
BY the way the taxpayers are already paying for medicaid so how many times do we have to pay for welfare slime.
They need to get up off of their fat asses.

Franco
04-10-2011, 09:38 AM
C'mon man.........

They did NOT throw abortion into the deal.
They added TAXPAYER FUNDED abortion into the deal.

Someone makes a mistake on a date last night and needs an abortion, well then I guess the progressive liberals say it's OK to kill the baby, but WE don't want to pay for it.

Please tell me you can see the difference.....PLEASE?????

Change is no longer coming.....it's happening!!!:D



RK

The fact that they attacked any part of it means it is an issue. An issue that will be used against the GOP in 2012. Why couldn't the just stay on message? The Tea Party was suppose to be about cutting the deficit. The more issues they add to thier agenda, they more divided they become.

To me, abortion isn't about a mistake that happened on a date. If anti-abortionist numbers are correct and that there have been 40 million, you can bet 30 million would be on government welfare! Adding to the millions already on Gov's teat.

Call abortion whatever you want to. Want to grow the welfare class, then abolish it and add billions more to the deficit!

And Boehner wants to raise the debt ceiling? Sounds like a Democrat to me. Or, DC politics as usual.

Losthwy
04-10-2011, 10:10 AM
It is more fun to use that knowledge to expose the abuses of the welfare slime and the DUMMOCRATS>

Does a well spoken, thinking, polite adult routinely use insults in their conversations?

Losthwy
04-10-2011, 10:16 AM
The fact that they attacked any part of it means it is an issue. An issue that will be used against the GOP in 2012. Why couldn't the just stay on message? The Tea Party was suppose to be about cutting the deficit. The more issues they add to thier agenda, they more divided they become.
To me, abortion isn't about a mistake that happened on a date. If anti-abortionist numbers are correct and that there have been 40 million, you can bet 30 million would be on government welfare! Adding to the millions already on Gov's teat.
Call abortion whatever you want to. Want to grow the welfare class, then abolish it and add billions more to the deficit!


I'll second what you posted, esp. what is highlighted in bold. This might sound cold but I believe abortions to be cost effective.

Roger Perry
04-10-2011, 10:20 AM
The fact that they attacked any part of it means it is an issue. An issue that will be used against the GOP in 2012. Why couldn't the just stay on message? The Tea Party was suppose to be about cutting the deficit. The more issues they add to thier agenda, they more divided they become.

To me, abortion isn't about a mistake that happened on a date. If anti-abortionist numbers are correct and that there have been 40 million, you can bet 30 million would be on government welfare! Adding to the millions already on Gov's teat.

Call abortion whatever you want to. Want to grow the welfare class, then abolish it and add billions more to the deficit!

And Boehner wants to raise the debt ceiling? Sounds like a Democrat to me. Or, DC politics as usual.

Wouldn't RK, little RK and Luv have a hissy fit if there were 30 million more Democrats born?????????????????????

luvmylabs23139
04-10-2011, 10:21 AM
Does a well spoken, thinking, polite adult routinely use insults in their conversations?
So since you won't debate the facts you opt attack my direct aproach to the subject.
NO one has ever said that I dance around polite POLTICAL CORRECT BS. I much prefer to be blunt and honest.
I will never play that game.
Welfare slime are what they are.
Anyone who takes someone elses' hard earned money is a pile of dog crap end of story.
There is nothing polite about someone stealing what someone else earned.

luvmylabs23139
04-10-2011, 10:23 AM
Wouldn't RK, little RK and Luv have a hissy fit if there were 30 million more Democrats born?????????????????????

Any new dum is one to many.:-P

Roger Perry
04-10-2011, 10:54 AM
Any new dum is one to many.:-P

Planned Parenthood itself estimates it prevents more than 620,000 unintended pregnancies each year, and 220,000 abortions.

Well Luvy, without planned parenthood, looks like there would be almost a million more democrats born every year. And that does not even count the number of abortions preformed every year.;-)

Yeah, lets make abortion illegal. But the Republicans need to go through the supreme court to do it.

luvmylabs23139
04-10-2011, 11:00 AM
Planned Parenthood itself estimates it prevents more than 620,000 unintended pregnancies each year, and 220,000 abortions.

Well Luvy, without planned parenthood, looks like there would be almost a million more democrats born every year. And that does not even count the number of abortions preformed every year.;-)

Yeah, lets make abortion illegal. But the Republicans need to go through the supreme court to do it.
Why the hell should I pay for anyones' spawn,
If you want to pay for it have at it. I just hope you can pay for it rather than steal money from taxpayers.

Losthwy
04-10-2011, 11:18 AM
. I much prefer to be blunt and honest.

Blunt and honest I take no issue with. Insults, name calling and demagoguery are another matter.
It is possible to be blunt and honest without insults.

Uncle Bill
04-10-2011, 01:14 PM
Planned Parenthood itself estimates it prevents more than 620,000 unintended pregnancies each year, and 220,000 abortions.

Well Luvy, without planned parenthood, looks like there would be almost a million more democrats born every year. And that does not even count the number of abortions preformed every year.;-)

Yeah, lets make abortion illegal. But the Republicans need to go through the supreme court to do it.


Once again, you, you're lib buddies and Franco are reading this all wrong. You can continue to have your abortions, but the tax-payers shouldn't be required to fund it.

Further more, after the PP is de-funded, it's time to remove ALL funding for babies born out of wedlock, thus stopping the socialistic baby-mills. Wean away these baby-makers from food stamps, and watch that portion of the welfare state shrink.

After throwing several of the deadbeat fathers into work camps, they will start keeping their zippers closed.

After jailing several of these so-called 'mothers' that just keep having babies for the welfare checks, for child neglect, due to no more food stamps etc., some of them should have the intelligence to put a stop to their way of life.

Roger Perry
04-10-2011, 01:23 PM
Once again, you, you're lib buddies and Franco are reading this all wrong. You can continue to have your abortions, but the tax-payers shouldn't be required to fund it.

Further more, after the PP is de-funded, it's time to remove ALL funding for babies born out of wedlock, thus stopping the socialistic baby-mills. Wean away these baby-makers from food stamps, and watch that portion of the welfare state shrink.

After throwing several of the deadbeat fathers into work camps, they will start keeping their zippers closed.

After jailing several of these so-called 'mothers' that just keep having babies for the welfare checks, for child neglect, due to no more food stamps etc., some of them should have the intelligence to put a stop to their way of life.

What part of taxpayer funding for abortions are illegal don't you understand????????????

road kill
04-10-2011, 01:26 PM
What part of taxpayer funding for abortions are illegal don't you understand????????????


uhhhh....the part where the federal government gives taxpayer dollars to an organization that commits abortion.


Which part of that don't you understand??


RK

dnf777
04-10-2011, 07:25 PM
Been doing far better things this w/e....

Checking in to get a good laugh....and wasn't disappointed!

Thanks Stan.

Chris Atkinson
04-11-2011, 10:15 PM
Yet another one with crummy behavior.

Guys....knock it off...now.

Personal stuff, uncivil stuff, it's done here.

Cool it.

Thanks, Chris

JDogger
04-11-2011, 10:33 PM
Yet another one with crummy behavior.

Guys....knock it off...now.

Personal stuff, uncivil stuff, it's done here.

Cool it.

Thanks, Chris

I guess the "mosh pit" concept is no longer de rigueur, on PP. I'll mind my P's and Q's fer sure.
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/mind-your-ps-and-qs.html

JDogger

Chris Atkinson
04-11-2011, 10:40 PM
I guess the "mosh pit" concept is no longer de rigueur, on PP. I'll mind my P's and Q's fer sure.
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/mind-your-ps-and-qs.html

JDogger

JDogger,

You are mistaken.

The "mosh pit" concept is this:

If you get in the mosh pit, and then you decide you don't like it, please don't come complaining to me that you were mistreated. If you got in the pit and jumped around, don't complain to me if you got stomped.

So let me be abundantly clear to you:

I do not hang out on this subforum very often.

But I am looking it over tonight and I've seen some behaviors that violate the very clear guidelines for this forum:

"Be civil or be banned"...

Please be civil.... Call it whatever letters of the alphabet you like. I call it treating others like you yourself would like to be treated. Please feel free to show me where I am in error, where I am inconsistent, or where I have been unclear or misleading.
How about if you do that via PM though so we can have some candid discussion.

Also, call me live if you like: 217-454-0361

Thanks, Chris