PDA

View Full Version : Conspiracy theorist?



duk4me
05-02-2011, 03:09 PM
Ok so how long will it take for El Guido, er I mean al=qaido, to release a video of Bin Laden and deny his demise?

Wheres the photo regards,

WRL
05-02-2011, 03:22 PM
I wondered that myself.....

I just read a report though that the body has 100% been confirmed it was him and his body disposed of.

So, probably we will see a "replacement and the fight will go on" video.

But it DID cross my mind that a "fake" might show up.

WRL

mjh345
05-02-2011, 03:35 PM
I can certainly envision some other conspiracy theories being floated around.............by both sides

Roger Perry
05-02-2011, 03:40 PM
I can certainly envision some other conspiracy theories being floated around.............by both sides

Well, it will not take long before Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity and others to find fault somewhere along the line you can count on it.

limiman12
05-02-2011, 03:53 PM
It actually occured to me that Bin Laden could have recorded a video ahead of time for such a purpose.

A replace and continue video is more likely though. Look for a retalitory period for a while but this is a good step in the right direction.

caryalsobrook
05-02-2011, 04:00 PM
Well, it will not take long before Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity and others to find fault somewhere along the line you can count on it.

You must stay glued to the tv and radio listening to rush ans Sean all the time!!!!!!!

duk4me
05-02-2011, 04:04 PM
It actually occured to me that Bin Laden could have recorded a video ahead of time for such a purpose.

A replace and continue video is more likely though. Look for a retalitory period for a while but this is a good step in the right direction.

My thoughts exactly, could be hundreds of those videos.

Roger Perry
05-02-2011, 04:08 PM
You must stay glued to the tv and radio listening to rush ans Sean all the time!!!!!!!

Not at all. I do not listen to their trash talking. I'm sure we will hear all about it though. Huntinman quoted a faux new article that Sean Hannity reported as news and ran with it. It was about Shell oil being denied drilling rights in Alaska. Turns out the story was from 2008 when Bush was President and faux never checked the valdidity before reporting the story.

Oh, just to set the record straight, I do not listen to the left wing trash talking entertainers on radio either.

M&K's Retrievers
05-02-2011, 04:22 PM
Not at all. I do not listen to their trash talking. I'm sure we will hear all about it though. Huntinman quoted a faux new article that Sean Hannity reported as news and ran with it. It was about Shell oil being denied drilling rights in Alaska. Turns out the story was from 2008 when Bush was President and faux never checked the valdidity before reporting the story.

Oh, just to set the record straight, I do not listen to the left wing trash talking entertainers on radio either.

Heck, Roger, you don't need a radio. You probably get great reception from your tin foil hat. ;-)

BonMallari
05-02-2011, 04:34 PM
Not at all. I do not listen to their trash talking. I'm sure we will hear all about it though. Huntinman quoted a faux new article that Sean Hannity reported as news and ran with it. It was about Shell oil being denied drilling rights in Alaska. Turns out the story was from 2008 when Bush was President and faux never checked the valdidity before reporting the story.

Oh, just to set the record straight, I do not listen to the left wing trash talking entertainers on radio either.



That's because you're too busy reading all the liberal blogs, just waiting to cut and paste another gotcha hatchet job filled with half truths and inuendos :-P:-P

Roger Perry
05-02-2011, 04:43 PM
That's because you're too busy reading all the liberal blogs, just waiting to cut and paste another gotcha hatchet job filled with half truths and inuendos :-P:-P

It's true, I read Capital Hill Blue and pick and choose the stories I read there but there are as many anti Obama/anti democrat stories as there are anti- Republican stories that can be found there. But more often than not these stories will be found in the main stream media news stories. ;-)

Capital Hill Blue is the oldest online non partisan news source on the internet.

starjack
05-02-2011, 04:44 PM
Well, it will not take long before Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity and others to find fault somewhere along the line you can count on it.

Just wondering were all the 9/11 truther are? You no the ones that said Bush new about 9/11 before it hppen and that it was Bushes fault.

badbullgator
05-03-2011, 07:39 AM
My only question is DNA analysis that supposedly confirmed it was UBL. That usually takes about 5 days. Even using real time PCR to amplify his DNA I am not sure how they could match him in LESS than 24 hours. I know that carriers have great medical facilities on board, but do they have a laboratory capable of doing DNA analysis? Where do you get this done during a covert opperation like this?
I don't think he was not killed, but much like the birth certificate, please just show us the proof and get it over with so it does not become the whole birth certificate thing all over again

BrianW
05-03-2011, 08:13 AM
Capital Hill Blue is the oldest online non partisan (?!?) news source on the internet.

That's some funny stuff right there! Maybe just stick to the Google tag:
The oldest political news site on the Internet (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.capitolhillblue.com%2F&rct=j&q=Capitol%20Hill%20Blue&ei=Jf2_TYG1DYq4sAOAnNSTCA&usg=AFQjCNGn4mS2qvd9hJKs7kYgJriY8BIxqw&cad=rja)
but non-partisan? :rolleyes:

code3retrievers
05-03-2011, 08:14 AM
Well, it will not take long before Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity and others to find fault somewhere along the line you can count on it.

So you are saying they are the right wing version of you, when it comes to Bush.

Roger Perry
05-03-2011, 08:50 AM
That's some funny stuff right there! Maybe just stick to the Google tag:
The oldest political news site on the Internet (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.capitolhillblue.com%2F&rct=j&q=Capitol%20Hill%20Blue&ei=Jf2_TYG1DYq4sAOAnNSTCA&usg=AFQjCNGn4mS2qvd9hJKs7kYgJriY8BIxqw&cad=rja)
but non-partisan? :rolleyes:

This is their claim-------------

Capitol Hill Blue

Online (http://newstrust.net/sources/list?medium=online) | Independent
Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial, non-partisan experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. We don't play favorites and we don't shill for any political party, philosophical group or ideological point-of-view. We don't indulge in flights of fancy or indulge in the conspiracy theory du jour

M&K's Retrievers
05-03-2011, 08:58 AM
This is their claim-------------

Capitol Hill Blue

Online (http://newstrust.net/sources/list?medium=online) | Independent
Capitol Hill Blue is a not-for-profit, non-commercial, non-partisan experiment in on-line journalism published as an information resource for our readers. We don't play favorites and we don't shill for any political party, philosophical group or ideological point-of-view. We don't indulge in flights of fancy or indulge in the conspiracy theory du jour

So this statement it the gospel truth while Fox News' claim of fair and balanced, we report, you decide is pure BS??

Goes around, comes around regards,