PDA

View Full Version : It's a Miracle!!



HPL
07-19-2012, 04:56 PM
One of the best ones I've heard yet. Many good (unanswered) questions.

http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&load=7202&mpid=56

How did this happen???

BonMallari
07-19-2012, 06:37 PM
One of the best ones I've heard yet. Many good (unanswered) questions.

http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&load=7202&mpid=56

How did this happen???


It happened because the myth the media built up is more attractive than the truth, they packaged and sold BHO the candidate like they would the newest laundry soap and the American public bought it hook line and sinker, now the American public is on the hook and is vigorously trying to spit it out, but like a largemouth bass they just wont let go of the bait...the other theory is that the American public's ego will not allow them to admit that they made a mistake and were duped by a slick marketing campaign, and an even slicker talking politician that wooed them into voting for hope and change

dback
07-19-2012, 06:58 PM
And Buzz in 3....... 2........ 1......

Gerry Clinchy
07-19-2012, 08:56 PM
Wish that Ed Klein had delved into some of these areas.

charly_t
07-19-2012, 11:32 PM
It happened because the myth the media built up is more attractive than the truth, they packaged and sold BHO the candidate like they would the newest laundry soap and the American public bought it hook line and sinker, now the American public is on the hook and is vigorously trying to spit it out, but like a largemouth bass they just wont let go of the bait...the other theory is that the American public's ego will not allow them to admit that they made a mistake and were duped by a slick marketing campaign, and an even slicker talking politician that wooed them into voting for hope and change

The second theory is my pick, however, the other has merit also.

Buzz
07-20-2012, 10:27 AM
That looked a lot like the Palin campaign in 2008.

road kill
07-20-2012, 10:41 AM
That looked a lot like the Palin campaign in 2008.
What?
Palin wasn't vetted?
The media gave her a pass?

You do have an interesting memory!!!!!

HPL
07-20-2012, 10:48 AM
That looked a lot like the Palin campaign in 2008.

That's the way you address those issues?

Buzz
07-20-2012, 10:56 AM
What?
Palin wasn't vetted?
The media gave her a pass?

You do have an interesting memory!!!!!


Did I say that?

Buzz
07-20-2012, 10:56 AM
That's the way you address those issues?


That's about as much time as it deserves.

I hope that this is the campaign they continue to fight against Obama.

That's how effective I think it is.

mjh345
07-20-2012, 11:16 AM
What?
Palin wasn't vetted?
!

Well if she was vetted, lets hope that whomever did the vetting is not working with Romney on the vetting of this years potential VP's!!!!

road kill
07-20-2012, 11:27 AM
Did I say that?

More or less, yes.

Obama has not been vetted and won't be.
There are several unanawered basic questions about him, all summarily dismissed by the accomplice media.

Palin was torn to pieces on trumped up family issues and sound bites out of context.
(and we know you hate "out of context" comments)

So the MIRACLE is the total lack of basic research on this ficttitious person, Barrack Obama.

Just like Palin????


I understand that all progressives think they are a little smarter than people like me who built and run a tiny little business, thanks only to you and you cohorts and the things the Govt built (with our money).
And by your definition, I am "RICH" and must be punished.:cool:
(I can assure you, we are anything but rich:rolleyes:)

But I do see it a little different than you.
I would like to see the "MIRACLE" get vetted like Palin was.
(my guess is Obama would be surprised at who he really is!!!!)
I think it would be an eye opener for some.
But probably not for those who will not see.............

ARay11
07-20-2012, 11:30 AM
More or less, yes.

Obama has not been vetted and won't be.
There are several unanawered basic questions about him, all summarily dismissed by the accomplice media.

Palin was torn to pieces on trumped up family issues and sound bites out of context.
(and we know you hate "out of context" comments)

So the MIRACLE is the total lack of basic research on this ficttitious person, Barrack Obama.

Just like Palin????


I understand that all progressives think they are a little smarter than people like me who built and run a tiny little business, thanks only to you and you cohorts and the things the Govt built (with our money).
And by your definition, I am "RICH" and must be punished.:cool:
(I can assure you, we are anything but rich:rolleyes:)

But I do see it a little different than you.
I would like to see the "MIRACLE" get vetted like Palin was.
(my guess is Obama would be surprised at who he really is!!!!)
I think it would be an eye opener for some.
But probably not for those who will not see.............

keep leadin that horse t' water... he still wont drink :confused:

Buzz
07-20-2012, 11:40 AM
More or less, yes.

Obama has not been vetted and won't be.
There are several unanawered basic questions about him, all summarily dismissed by the accomplice media.

Palin was torn to pieces on trumped up family issues and sound bites out of context.
(and we know you hate "out of context" comments)

So the MIRACLE is the total lack of basic research on this ficttitious person, Barrack Obama.

Just like Palin????


I understand that all progressives think they are a little smarter than people like me who built and run a tiny little business, thanks only to you and you cohorts and the things the Govt built (with our money).
And by your definition, I am "RICH" and must be punished.:cool:
(I can assure you, we are anything but rich:rolleyes:)

But I do see it a little different than you.
I would like to see the "MIRACLE" get vetted like Palin was.
(my guess is Obama would be surprised at who he really is!!!!)
I think it would be an eye opener for some.
But probably not for those who will not see.............


FYI. I was saying that this is the campaign that Palin ran against Obama in 2008.

BonMallari
07-20-2012, 12:56 PM
an interesting column from a noted liberal paper


Washington Post on Obama - FINALLY!


As I’m sure you know, the Washington Post Newspaper has always had a reputation for being extremely liberal, so the fact that their Editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in their newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. Finally, the truth about our radical President’s agenda is starting to trickle through the ‘protective walls’ built by our liberal media.


Matt Patterson (columnist for the Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)

Government & Society

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages.

How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present") ; and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that's when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.

Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.

But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job.

When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office

road kill
07-20-2012, 01:21 PM
FYI. I was saying that this is the campaign that Palin ran against Obama in 2008.

Like I said, you progressives are just a little smarter than we the unwashed........:cool: