Can you imagine???? [Archive] - RetrieverTraining.Net - the RTF

: Can you imagine????

Uncle Bill
09-08-2012, 11:27 AM
What America might be today, had we heeded this man's advice 4 years ago?


Jack Wheeler is a brilliant man who was the author of Reagan's strategy to break the back of the Soviet Union with the star wars race and expose their inner weakness. For years he wrote a weekly intelligence update that was extremely interesting and well structured and informative. He consults(ed) with several mega corporations on global trends and the future, etc. He is in semi-retirement now. He is a true patriot with a no-nonsense approach to everything. He is also a somewhat well-known mountain climber and adventurer.

Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler

The O-man, Barack Hussein Obama, is an eloquently tailored empty suit. No resume, no accomplishments, no experience, no original ideas, no understanding of how the economy works, no understanding of how the world works, no balls, nothing but abstract, empty rhetoric devoid of real substance.

He has no real identity. He is half-white, which he rejects. The rest of him is mostly Arab, which he hides but is disclosed by his non-African Arabic surname and his Arabic first and middle names as a way to triply proclaim his Arabic parentage to people in Kenya . Only a small part of him is African Black from his Luo grandmother, which he pretends he is exclusively.

What he isn't, not a genetic drop of, is 'African-American,' the descendant of enslaved Africans brought to America chained in slave ships. He hasn't a single ancestor who was a slave. Instead, his Arab ancestors were slave owners. Slave-trading was the main Arab business in East Africa for centuries until the British ended it.

Let that sink in: Obama is not the descendant of slaves, he is the descendant of slave owners. Thus he makes the perfect Liberal Messiah.

It's something Hillary doesn't understand - how some complete neophyte came out of the blue and stole the Dem nomination from her. Obamamania is beyond politics and reason. It is a true religious cult, whose adherents reject Christianity yet still believe in Original Sin, transferring it from the evil of being human to the evil of being white.

Thus Obama has become the white liberals' Christ, offering absolution from the Sin of Being White. There is no reason or logic behind it, no faults or flaws of his can diminish it, no arguments Hillary could make of any kind can be effective against it. The absurdity of Hypocrisy Clothed In Human Flesh being their Savior is all the more cause for liberals to worship him: Credo quia absurdum, I believe it because it is absurd.

Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a phony savior.

His candidacy is ridiculous and should not be taken seriously by any thinking American.

09-08-2012, 08:23 PM
This is the same Dr. Jack Wheeler who said that John McCain was clinically nuts and that Mc Cain cooperated with the Hanoi Communists for a couple of prostitutes and an apartment in Hanoi. Some bucko that Jack Wheeler.

Uncle Bill
09-09-2012, 10:29 AM
This is the same Dr. Jack Wheeler who said that John McCain was clinically nuts and that Mc Cain cooperated with the Hanoi Communists for a couple of prostitutes and an apartment in Hanoi. Some bucko that Jack Wheeler.

Much like your name, where we are to "assume" you were a 'sarge' in the military...this is another of your lefty "assumtions"? Why do you Democrats work so hard at propping up this incredibly failed regime? Your 'white guilt' is all over every post you make.

Here's another 'discovery' about your messiah that you will be quick to refute. Have at it..."phoneys of a feather will flock together".


Something you won't learn about from the mainstream media.,mod=2&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=obama+litigation+on+housing+discrimination&oq=obama+litigation+on+housing+dis&gs_l=serp.3.0.33i38.45519.64596.0.66117. RI4Q&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=a542392d10e4b1d3&biw=1763&bih=983 (,mod=2&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=obama+litigation+on+housing+discrimination&oq=obama+litigation+on+housing+dis&gs_l=serp.3.0.33i38.45519.64596.0.66117. RI4Q&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=a542392)

Obama & The Housing Crisis

You have to give the Democrats props for successfully sending the housing crisis down the memory hole.

From their campaign rhetoric, you’d think the so-called “failed policies of the past” were all Republican ideas like smaller government and lower taxes. No, the economic crisis had nothing to do with the housing bubble that began with a massive Democratic push to force banks to give home loans to people who couldn’t qualify for them. But with terrible timing for the Democrats, that inconvenient truth has burst out of the crypt and back into the news, just as they were convening in Charlotte.

Yesterday, the Daily Caller revealed some previously unpublished court information about a landmark case that many consider the fuse that set off the subprime mortgage boom and eventually, the economic meltdown. It was a 1995 discrimination lawsuit against Citibank, on behalf of a group of African-Americans who claimed they couldn’t get loans because of their race. It was part of a coordinated effort at the time by progressive groups. The banks didn’t want to be sued or accused of racism, so they loosened requirements for credit history and down payments. What the Daily Caller discovered is that among the original plaintiffs in that case, there was a startling loan failure rate. Out of about 186 homebuyers, roughly half have since gone bankrupt or received one or more foreclosure notices. As few as 19 still own homes with clean credit ratings. Even some of the plaintiffs now say the banks never should’ve made those loans.

And here’s the kicker: the lead attorney on that case that prompted banks to start making home loans to people who couldn’t qualify for them was a young Chicago community activist named Barack Obama.

09-09-2012, 10:51 AM
ALl I need to know about Obama and is party is they are for abortion on demand, they support partial birth abortions, they are for gay marriage not just the "I dont care what they do" but actually want the law rewritten, and they took God out of their platform sure they put his name back in when it became ovbvious they would lose this election if they didnt they still give no explanation why Gods name was taken out in the first place. And of course the fact the BO has NO experience in being President which is easy to see if you look back over the last four yrs. His slogan of yes we can became maybe but its going to be a long rough road In 4 yrs from now it will be I tried but it was just to much of a mess it was Bush's fault. I can see him winning because this is the America most want, no morales no values, just the GIVE ME . Watch hard core pawn in Detroit, and see the people come in to pawn something and they are told it has no value whats their reaction? GIVE ME MONEY, I WANT MY MONEY, YOU HAVE IT GIVE IT TO ME , thats where we are at in America

09-10-2012, 10:12 AM
I firmly believe they took God out intentionally in order to make a public spectacle of "Yes, Dems believe in God". However, their plans backfired on them when it went to a vote and they realized just how far left they have drifted.