I know that folks will not agree with me and that's fine. His son was headed out with those other guys to look for his dad and they were blown up as they got to the site. It was Robert Gibbs that said he should have chosen a better father and does not deny that the sixteen year old was targeted.
I really wished we all lived close by and could talk about all these things over a brew. Maybe an RTF POTUS summit should be scheduled so we can solve all our countries problems while working with dogs.
It doesn't matter if you are using a iPhone or Siri which will sometimes populates with the wrong word. There are a couple grammar policeman ready to pounce because they are feeling lonely and want another reply.
Originally Posted by mudminnow
This was the best article I found on the subject.
It said that he was killed two weeks after his father. After a second and better reading it did say that some officials said he was a target. Though if that was the case why would the Admin start an investigation into his death and do it before accusations came out claiming that he was targeted? I don't see a military purpose for killing the boy and a potential fall out that is best avoided by not doing it, so it doesn't make sense to me to say that he was targeted. Who knows though, logic does not win all the time.
Exactly. He is required by the Constitution to see that the laws are faithfully executed yet by executive order, and sometimes not even that, he is ignoring the law. He put off the group mandate be EO yet it's contained in the ACA with a firm date. There are several other examples.
Originally Posted by Buzz
Why don't you just read what you write before you post it? It might not correct all spelling, grammar, and syntax errors but hey, shouldn't you be a little smarter than your iphone, (hell, punctuation eludes me still) Siri, your android, even my trusty desktop keyboard.
Originally Posted by Dan Storts
Ultimately, don't we owe it to ourselves before we hit submit to proof it????
I could be wrong regards, JD