Seems McCain was none too pleased with Palin. Off Topic

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sky_view

By Alaska law the Governor cannot appoint herself....If Stevens does step down, as I hope he will, there will be another election in or within 90 days....

Juli

---

I read something today that said there was a similar situation in the past where a "deal" was made. The Governor stepped down, the Lt. Governor took office as Governor and appointed the outgoing Governor as Senator.

Juli, could it happen that way?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ron in Portland

I read something today that said there was a similar situation in the past where a "deal" was made. The Governor stepped down, the Lt. Governor took office as Governor and appointed the outgoing Governor as Senator.

Juli, could it happen that way?

---

If it is possible, a few years in Washington would probably be quite educational, assuming that she did not get corrupted like the rest of the beltway crowd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AmiableLabs

Buzz, Fox News IS the most unbiased. EVERY objective study I have seen proves it. Try watching it. They make every effort to have on commentators from both sides of every issue.

---

Kevin has a point.

Wasn't it Fox that first reported the leakage on Lady Sarah? If they were really in the bag for the Republicans they would have buried it like the LA Times did with the Obama Tape.

Fair And Balanced Regards,

Joe S.

Do a Google on "Wasilla Hillbillies".

I don't believe Palin would be so stupid as to step down as gov, just so that she could be a Senator....

but hey, you never know!

Juli

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arturo

Well mr. ha ha. Who do you think is the most unbiased? The key word is most. You gots to pay attention or this stuff will go right over your head. Then you will end up posting about stuff you didn't even understand. They are all biased. Which one do you think is the least biased. Feel free to add any network you want!
abc
cbs
nbc
msnbc
cnn
fox

---

FOX = MSNBC

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Losthwy

Do a Google on "Wasilla Hillbillies".

---

Are you saying that a disguised anonymous source is credible? If that is the case, then I could register on this forum under an assumed name and start a thread saying anything I want about you and everybody should believe me just because it appears on this forum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Buzz

FOX = MSNBC

---

Maybe something went over my head this time. What the hel does that mean.:confused:
FOX = FOX
MSN & NBC = MSNBC

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arturo

Maybe something went over my head this time. What the hel does that mean.:confused:
FOX = FOX
MSN & NBC = MSNBC

---

Fox is to conservatives what MSNBC is to liberals.

In other words, I rate both networks equal in objectivity.

I would not try and rate the other networks. I watch a little CNN, but I primarily watch FOX, MSNBC, and CSPAN.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Buzz

Fox is to conservatives what MSNBC is to liberals.

In other words, I rate both networks equal in objectivity.

I would not try and rate the other networks. I watch a little CNN, but I primarily watch FOX, MSNBC, and CSPAN.

---

Is there a media bias? The answer is clearly yes! The press spent $9.6 million following Obama on the campaign and $4.4 million following the McCain campaign. In other words, the media spent more than twice as much following Obama. The worst offender was CBS, which spent $1.2 million traveling with Obama but only $222,000 traveling with the McCain. In other words, CBS spent almost 6 times as much following Obama as they spent following McCain. Even FOX News spent more on the Obama campaign, $496,000, than on the McCain campaign, $313,000. Clearly, the media was more interested in traveling on the Obama Express than on the Straight Talk Express. So much for objectivity!

I you do a little objective research you will note that even FOX News leans a little to the left.