You are correct. It was a columnist. I did a quick qoogle search and this was a specific article that listed specific results from the study. I really did not want to waste time looking through the study if there was a good summary of some of the results. Again, rather than point the finger at the messenger or the funder to divert attention from the results, do you have any specifics on why the study is biased?
No, it wasn't a newspaper article. It was an editorial column. You do know the difference don't you? I'm sure you do. Perhaps that's why you took out the first and last paragraphs of the column which were heavy with overt editorializing. I'm sure you'd get a good chuckle out of me using a Rush Limbaugh editorial as evidence supporting one of my opinions. Just as I got a good laugh at you trying to fob off an editorial as legit news that supported the veracity of a study prepared by a very liberal public opinion organization.