Doc Miller:
This thread has been closed out. It appears the main motive of the initiator is "Lets you and him fight." It no longer deserves the dignity of a reply.
Printable View
Doc Miller:
This thread has been closed out. It appears the main motive of the initiator is "Lets you and him fight." It no longer deserves the dignity of a reply.
I ignored you the first time as I wasn't prepared to waste time arguing with a guy, who up until a few days ago, didn't even realize there was a Sudanese component to the "wtf did Clinton do to stop 9/11" discussion...it would have been like discussing space travel with a Khalahari bushman. Since you're persisting, I'm assuming you're all googled up now and are flush with Daily Kos-approved rebuttals, so I'll bite...what facts are wrong? And please tell me you're holding more cards in your hand than the 9/11 Commission discounting the Sudan/Clinton connection based entirely upon Team Clinton denials,...as if a Clinton denial of anything isn't laughable enough, you've got a self-important former President, while grasping to remain relevent, who steps on his own cack and blurts out...
Quote:
"At the time, 1996, he [bin Laden] had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America. So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have. But they thought it [the bin Laden issue] was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan".
I agree Zeus,
I am very impressed with Hews assumed clairevoyence, as it appears he thinks he knows what incident I was referring to. Furthermore he presumes to know what I knew and when I knew it. However it appears Hew is going to get an incomplete on his homework assignment.
So Hew you run along and finish your homework project. Although, I suspect Hew may have found the facts and is just a little embarressed to admit them in front of the rest of the class
Here is an interesting report on the legacy: http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/4452/