And those headlines are from what sources?
The answer: None. They are made up.
This is, like most of the garbage UB posts, from an email that has been circulating, which has no basis in fact.
Printable View
And those headlines are from what sources?
The answer: None. They are made up.
This is, like most of the garbage UB posts, from an email that has been circulating, which has no basis in fact.
And what's so hilarious is how you guppy up. Fact is, they are so truthful it even made you pull out one of the swords you had fallen on, and acknowledge that truth.
It's always reassuring to witness the views of an Obama voter....childish and ignorant. But hey!!...you and your ilk are in charge. It just makes me curious why you aren't happier about it?:rolleyes:
UB
So you are in the tank as well? You doubt what was stated? You fall on the sword for the Main Street Press also? If you can't recall what was being headlined when W was inaugurated 4 years ago, I can understand now why you are lost on the hiway.
I'll provide the validity when you and your Obama lovers show me a valid birth certificate. At this point he is an illigitimate POTUS. Find the proof that he isn't.
UB
Unlike some, I generally try to research the facts behind opinion pieces I read because of the high likelihood that those selling a position (liberal, conservative, or otherwise) are willing to shade the facts to fit their stories. After a fair amount of searching, I couldn't find any factual basis for your post on this thread.
For now, I suspect that it's a lie fabricated maliciously to support a questionable thesis. That makes it consistent with most of the email drivel that gets pasted into threads under hysterical headlines. Your response appears to indicate that it doesn't matter if it's true or not because it makes your point. It seems that there is a fine line between throwing mud and being mud that may have been crossed.
My own impression is that most media are biased. In addition, some are dishonest, which is a completely different thing. The later in the evening a show comes on, the less likely it is to care about the facts behind its reports. With concentration of ownership and cutbacks in news staffing, truth is the biggest victim because few outlets have the resources to investigate truth. Instead, under pressure from the least honest and most opinionated, they substitute an illusion of "balance" for factual analysis. The theory is that as long as there is dispute there can't be any definitive facts and all opinions should therefore be reported with equal merit. This is absurd but fits well for those who view facts as being largely irrelevant in the wars of ideology. Absent references that support its allegations, the email you posted seems to fit nicely in this mold.
And, by the way, a valid birth certificate has been produced repeatedly -- most recently to the Supreme Court. Those who continue to shout this kind of claim have no credibility at all.
Another flowery post by no less than the ultimate photog. I'd forgotten you were part of the pavarattzi that has ordained the POTUS. I'm sure he will live up to every expectation you have.
BUT WHY THE HELL ARE YOU ALL SO GLUM???? We've just begun with your takeover and season to celebrate. But you are all so defensive. Just think of the 8 years of bashing you gave the POTUS that is leaving office. You read my small post on a "DOGGY BB", and you are into name calling, garbage slinging, and all sorts of getting yer panties in a bunch. Then if I reciprocate, you jump on me and call foul.
Holy moly...if y'all are gonna be so thin skinned, you'll all be so apoplectic I won't even be able to begin any bashing to remotely offset what you have been doing so well during the past 8 years.
And BTW, If it has been placed in the Supreme Court, show me where it can be seen. Those that have offer no proof have no credibility at all.
But I will say, it's good to see a vibrant contingent of liberals and socialists on this BB. Wouldn't want it any other way. Shoot, I couldn't hold a candle to HEW in an arguement OR even a discussion. And Bob and Cory, and Mr. Amiable are just too...well amiable.
And Marvin and Dan are so erudite, as are so many of the 'conservative' views posted on this BB, I need some of you lefties around, or my posts would never get to be any fun. After all, we can only sling so many arrows at MG. Besides, the last I looked, he was a far cry from being liberal anyway....He and Art are just in it for the GDG.
FWIW, that's what this forum is mainly comprised of, so where's the beef? If you think I gotta provide undisputable proof for every piece of GobbleDyGook that I post, get a life. But do stay skeptical, because the fun has just begun. Enjoy the journey.
UB
For what it's worth, I voted against Bush in 2000 and questioned the legitimacy of his "election". However, at the time of his inauguration I hoped sincerely that he would be successful for the sake of our country and our world. I am sad about the fact, as I see it, that his presidency was disastrous for all just as I was sad abut Carter's failure even though I voted for him. I voted for Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004 but was not enamored of either. I also voted for Obama and hope, for the sake of us all, that he is successful. However, I am far from worshiping him in any way. I believe he should be watched with vigilance the same as any other president. Can I assume from your words that you personally worship Bush or McCain?
One of Obama's comments tonight, as during the campaign, is that "as Americans, what holds us together is more important than what drives us apart." I think that this sentiment, more than any other, explains why he was elected by the majority of the American electorate. By contrast, many conservatives seem to have adopted the notion that it is better to be "right" (pun intended) than it is to survive as a people and nation. These are the people who believe that McCain lost because he wasn't conservative enough. In the forthcoming struggle for control of the Republican party, I hope these true believers are evicted since they will destroy the party and give too much power to the Democrats. I don't think that type of imbalance will help our nation in the future any more than Bush's abuse of power helped in the past.