The smilie leads me to suspect the later.
Very, very big of you:rolleyes:
http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/22685.html The only data they show is from '81 through 2005, but in those 24 years Texas never received more than they paid in taxes.
Regardless, I don't think you really want to get into comparisons of each states' relative net worth to the Union. Texas produces oil, energy, refining, beef, and agriculture for much of America. Minnesotaaah provides us with luetefisk and "A Prarie Home Companion."
In the rankings for 2005 Minnesota was 48th, Texas was 42nd. Pretty close for a beef/lutefisk comparision.
Florida was 23rd, a nice middle ranking to be sure, since they provide us with OJ, flamingos and sunburn.
New Mexico was 4th, a big differential to be sure, but then we have Las Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories, making all those bombs to protect us all from the the Red Menace:rolleyes:
Yes, Hew, the old data suggests that Texas gets about the same it pays in. That's why I made the statement in my last post. Not sure about more recent data but heard reports that they get a bit more back now. Given this, I have changed my original post so it is more accurate as follows:
Interesting. At least on this issue the conservatives here are consistent. In the past, when a person said that they would leave the USA because they were fearful of the policies of a President's administration some of the conservatives here have typed things like:
Too bad though, just like these elite hollywood liberals, Texas probably won't leave the USA either. We could really use a couple big military bases up here and any large state pulling out would sure reduce the long term social security and medicare/medicaid burden for the rest of the country (also, as Hew points out, do not forget about all that money being spent on border patrol, and NASA). I hope Governor Perry has more guts than the liberal hollywood elite and not only talks the talk, but walks the walk. ;)
Fortunately or unfortunately, the vast majority of Texans disagree with their governor on this. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...75_opt_to_stay.
Is that better for you? Hopefully without the tax reference it is more on point so that you will be less distracted. Oh, and by the way, I am all for more responsible government spending and I agree with the folks that think secession is a bad idea.
So...if Texas secedes... does that mean they won't come here to ski anymore....? Maybe the slopes of Flooridaah.
Sorry UB. I'll just keep posting the facts from time to time and reserve the right to respond to interesting weather reports.
There you go again Jeff, trying to argue on point and with the facts on your side.
For a bit of balance based on the real facts, you may want to check out this article
Great response but I need to make a point of clarification. I never said that I "enjoyed" subsidize your state's existence with my federal tax dollars. I just stated the facts.
This is pure speculation and contrary to the facts at hand but convoluted logic is a mainstay here so I am not surprised.
So, the truth is now "crap being spread". If you want to provide evidence that anything I put out there is untrue then have at it.
Hmmmm... I was thinking that just because the Palin/McCain camp says it is the truth over and over and over doesn't make it the truth.
She said in her speech that she is a hockey Mom not a soccer mom. I think she was also in the state pageant not the county. Please, let's get the facts straight.
Now let's talk about public employee retirement &/or the plush retirement of the elected critters. That's considered to be a bigger ticking time bomb by most of the knowledgeable individuals who will put it on the table. I really feel for the government employees of any type when they step into whine mode. I will not call attention to any particular group as we all know who they are.
My original message simply was an attempt to acknowledge that some of the conservatives that post here were consistent (first sentence=more crux like). When the liberal hollywood elite threatened to leave the country they stepped up and said Yeah!, or better yet "AMF!". Now that the Governor of Texas said the same things, some said great idea too. I also acknowledged that, depending on your point of view, it was good that the majority of Texans did not agree with their governor (last sentence=more crux like too). At this point I could have also made a statement like "way to try and rally the base Governor" but I refrained from adding such useless folly since I figured my other phrase inserted in parenthesis would be enough of a burr for some and I can always save that one for another time anyway.
Prior to my second post I double checked my facts related to the anecdotal statement, noted my mistake, and then re-posted a corrected version after your next reply. What more do you expect from a 6 year old?
One last thing, next time I want to do a keyword search of past records of what I or others have typed here can I contract with you? ;) You seem to do good work.
Please note, this is a response to an off topic post directed at me. I apologize in advance. If you are interested in "the republic of Texas" it will not be mentioned.
"I view it as investing a part of my retirement portfolio in federal government bond funds and got over it long ago"
Just a quick wake up call, but nothing could be further than the truth. Your socia security has been spent every year and all you have is the hope that the next generation will keep paying in so you get something.You are not investing in government bonds but paying for the benefits of those currently on SS.