how is that different than what Reagan rush or hannity believe?
Printable View
how is that different than what Reagan rush or hannity believe?
Rush and Hannity are two of former Pres. Reagan biggest supporters. Though Reagan was a huge improvement over Carter, I would hardly classify him as a Conservative.
First, no real Conservative would have out-of-control spending like we had in the Reagan years.
Two, no real Conservative would have granted Amnesty to illegal aliens. All that did was create the current flood of illegals.
Three, no real Conservative would have made the deal with Iran, trading arms for hostages.
Real Conservatives, not the new definition of Conservative stand for;
Fiscally balanced budgets/small government
Strong military
Defend the Constitution
Provide the infastructure for commerce
Personal freedom
Seperation of chruch from state
which if you listen to them talk is what they advocate. I partially agree with you that Rush and Hannity are bad for the conservative movement but for different reasons. They being very loud public figures are easily picked upon by liberals. They say what most all of us conservatives think, so i don't really see how you disagree with them unless you don't listen to them at all. Rush is more of the theatrical one and sometimes talks out his ass so i could see how you may disagree with a SMALL portion of what he says.
I wanted to get past this Texas game today before I opened my yapper. We've got a great bunch of kids but not the power at the plate we've had in the past. I've got a whole pile of stats saved up to throw at you SEC boyzs......IF.......we get past the Short HornsQuote:
Originally Posted by Franco
Hannity did me in with his defense ofthe Iraq War. He keep calling it the, "frontline of defense against Islamic terrorist". We all know that is not true, the front line against the terrorist is on the Afganistan/Pakistan boarder. Our occupation of Iraq has ben a big mistake and the reason we have Obama today. He and Rush are big moth=pieces that are often wrong and that is why you will see any serious Republican candidate avoid those two like the plague. Yes, sometimes they get ot right but when a talkhost can't be objective, then they are pretty much useless.Quote:
Originally Posted by eildydar
DBack, we fear ASU the most. Your pitching is as good as ours.
Well, first off I'm glad he is staying in the PAC...BUT...it's a long ways to Feb. I'm a little suprised with his choice but you knew daddy wasn't going to stand for him to become a 'condom'. You've got a good class going but you need alot more than just him....you just lost a very good QB and what was your record with him again :-) :-) Thank God he didn't go to the SEC (several were high on his list, Georgia, LSU and Florida for starters)....the crowing from those 'Mealy Mouthed Maggots' might have forced me to open a vein.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin S
Sorry UB that we've hijacked this thread so badly.
Have you ever sought help for anger issues?Quote:
Originally Posted by dback
You mean.....other than your sage counsel???????? :-) :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by kjrice
LOL! You mut be working junior pretty hard, since he is going to be taking some time off in September. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dback
You must agree then, that most (if not all) are pretty much worthless at times since they all (left and right) lose their objectivity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
Not last night......ugly.....6 run lead with Leake on the mound you'd of thought it was in the bank.Quote:
DBack, we fear ASU the most. Your pitching is as good as ours.