Refer to post #3.Quote:
Originally Posted by subroc
Printable View
Refer to post #3.Quote:
Originally Posted by subroc
Base your opinions on your "hunch" if you so choose. Most prefer her history.Quote:
Originally Posted by dnf777
fp
I would more aptly call it "hoping for the best", but expecting the worst. I'll hunch away, because my opinion doesn't mean a rat's A## in this affair!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayou Magic
As for her history, she has been noted to be more severe on criminals than her peers, including many conservatives. If she follows the law regarding illegal immigration, I can only hope we may have some sensical rulings coming soon. Lord knows we haven't seen any in my life time!
Just trying to be optimistic.
I sat and watched her dance for a couple of hours. Such fancy words
Don't believe she answered many of the questions . And the question askers seemd frustrated that she could dance so well,,,use every word in the dictionary and not say a thing. I think she'll fit right in.
Pete
I wish one of them would stand up and address the issue that deflection and deceit is unethical (Organization Behavior 8th ed). Then proceed to ask only yes or no questions, and remind her that ansewers beyond, Yes or No are unethical unless she chooses not to address the question. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
TerryQuote:
wish one of them would stand up and address the issue that deflection and deceit is unethical (Organization Behavior 8th ed). Then proceed to ask only yes or no questions, and remind her that ansewers beyond, Yes or No are unethical unless she chooses not to address the question. :smile: Today 01:21 PM
I agree with you whole hartily,,, even in a court of law, lawers ask alot of yes or no questions without the witness being able to explain. She should be treated the same.
Its tough to tango using yes or no answeres.
Pete
I would think that you would want to hear the richness of her experienced Latina opinions!!??!!??Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
If the Democrats that are on the panel should vote to dismiss her based on her answers. This is nothing more than a campaign.
al franken was a embarrassment to his elected position, state and our country. His contribution shows what a joke this hearing his.
Sotomayor wins key GOP support
July 18, 2009 - 6:52am.
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/files...9johnkylap.jpg
Three Republican senators said Friday they will back President Barack Obama's choice of Sonia Sotomayor to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, setting the stage for a likely easy confirmation.
"Given her judicial record, and her testimony this week, it is my determination that Judge Sotomayor is well-qualified to serve as associate justice of the United States Supreme Court," Cuban-born Senator Mel Martinez of Florida said on his website.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Perry
If it takes 3 Republicans to validate your opinion, it is pretty weak!!