Bar Stool Economics

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Buzz

What a pri¢k.

---

Whom are you referring?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by M&K's Retrievers

Aren't Wi-Fi and lap tops great? :D

---

They're great in that I can sit by the wood stove here at home and research/post but I can't afford $3+ a beer to do it from a bar. :(

dnf, this professor's treatise was totally about individuals yet you turn reflexively to rail about corporate taxes. :confused: Then close by denying the whole premise.
Was that #3 or #18? Or maybe #29?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrianW

They're great in that I can sit by the wood stove here at home and research/post but I can't afford $3+ a beer to do it from a bar. :(

dnf, this professor's treatise was totally about individuals yet you turn reflexively to rail about corporate taxes. :confused: Then close by denying the whole premise.
Was that #3 or #18? Or maybe #29?

---

The allegory implied that taxing the rich will force them to move overseas. I just pointed out that corporate taxes (ie "the rich", since now we may consider corporations as individuals, according to the SCOTUS, remember?)
are already at historic lows, and yet the exodus continues!! That IS the premise in question.

I have no idea what numbers your referring to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dnf777

....
I have no idea what numbers your referring to.

---

Really? Really? :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by M&K's Retrievers

Really? Really? :rolleyes:

---

Oh, Hoosier's list. Yes, I PM'd him and thanked him for that.
Except the part about personal insults, which are not a legitimate debate tactic, those were good guidelines and probably familiar, at least in usage, to most who engage in constructive debate or argumentation.

If more would read and follow those, we'd have better discussions here! :D
I see many here know and practice the evasion and diversion tactics very well! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dnf777

Oh, Hoosier's list. Yes, I PM'd him and thanked him for that.
Except the part about personal insults, which are not a legitimate debate tactic, those were good guidelines and probably familiar, at least in usage, to most who engage in constructive debate or argumentation.

If more would read and follow those, we'd have better discussions here! :D
I see many here know and practice the evasion and diversion tactics very well! :D

---

Whatever. You be sure and let know what your rules are.

dnf's rules of order regards,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by M&K's Retrievers

Whatever. You be sure and let know what your rules are.

dnf's rules of order regards,

---

How about we agree on ONE rule, and that is no more BS meaningless posts like this one? We can exchange childish jabs and insults, but each post must at least attempt to address the substance of the topic?

Whadya say?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dnf777

How about we agree on ONE rule, and that is no more BS meaningless posts like this one? We can exchange childish jabs and insults, but each post must at least attempt to address the substance of the topic?

Whadya say?

---

Whatever you say.

You da man, regards

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dnf777

How about we agree on ONE rule, and that is no more BS meaningless posts like this one? We can exchange childish jabs and insults, but each post must at least attempt to address the substance of the topic?

Whadya say?

---

I'd put this in my sig line, but I'd probably be asked to remove that too...:D;):cool::D

Oh, and just so I address something related to the topic: I like beer. Good enough?:D