Printable View
The Grand is gonna be in your backyard this year, Mike. If I can juggle my work schedule I plan to be there. I would love to meet you in person. NM is now part of region 9-A in the HRC. Our states do touch physicaly,if not so much socialy nor politicalyQuote:
Originally Posted by M&K's Retrievers
JD
Plz excuse spelling...
Looks like the next two Grands are nearby. Let's keep in touch and get that done.Quote:
Originally Posted by JDogger
Fer Sure...JDQuote:
Originally Posted by M&K's Retrievers
Paul lines up better with Obama....so if you like Ron Paul, you should vote for Obama.
Franco's idea of someone with enough experience to be president is someone that has been in congress over 20 years and has passed one bill...and not even one of substance. To me this is not experience this is an old man that has been sucking off the tax payer for over 20 years. A do nothing is not what we need in the office of the president. We need someone who will change the status quo not sit there and talk a big game but do nothing.
Ok I'll bite...how did you come to that conclusion...Quote:
Originally Posted by sambo
RP has attempted many times to reform the way business is done in DC and has been rejected by the Status Quo! Just look at Congress' approval rating and realize that RP has been the outsider all the time. His last piece of legislation will pass and that is the annual audit of the Federal Reserve which should have been passed 18 years ago when he first introduced that legislation. Now that everyone knows what he has known for years, that the Fed is corrupt, it will sail through the Senate!Quote:
Originally Posted by Cody Covey
Sambo. RP and Obama have few issues in common. RP is for a Balanced Budget, fiscal restraints, Free Markets and self reliance. None of which is supported by the Dems or Repubs.
So then what makes you think he would accomplish anything as president if he is so rejected by the current establishment? Also in case you missed it your list of things RP is for is also things supported by the current Republicans and the house has tried to pass many things to balance the budget and practice fiscal restraint. Can you fault the current crop of republicans because the Senate is stonewalling them?
I see your line of thinking...but....Quote:
Originally Posted by Cody Covey
If we want true change, and we are tired of the "establishment" then we should in fact elect someone "different" and why do we care if he can/cannot get along with the "establishment" we dont like anyway?
I do think someone seeking the presidency should be able to "get along" but with the current regime, that would mean he would also have to "go along"...well, then we wouldnt like him much would we?
LOL...back to abbott and costello.....