Evolution a lie from the pit of hell

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-10-2012, 04:38 PM
menmon

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonMallari

Explain to me where I said you were not worthy of God, heck I am not worthy of God , thats kind of why I am going to church again...at least we agree on two things...abortion and leaving judgement to God not each other...

and I have also learned you dont have to be in a church to be a spiritual person, and it doesnt have to be on Sunday...I attended church on Saturday's as a kid...and now I attend on Wed nights because I am off work and able to make services on a regular basis

This whole tit for tat over right vs left is dividing americans. I think folks are better off if the dems set policy and obviously you think folks are better off if the repub are setting policy. Both sides have their strong suits, but neither has it right. At this point in history, I think a more liberal approach is best, and you disagree. That is totally ok. If your guys wins next month life will go on and mine will change very little as yours, as if my guy wins we will still get up and put our socks on in the morning.

Only real difference in us is that you think making the road easier for the well to do makes your road easier, and I think giving power to the less fortunate make more opportunity for the less fortunate.

You still think that the republican will control spending, and I have lived longer and know that they will just spend on the things that they think are important.

Bottomline I'll be fine who ever gets elected....I just think the working man needs a better bargining position. Those are my roots and they are why I have had the sucess I've had, and I want forget that even if it cost me a few more dollars in tax
10-10-2012, 05:50 PM
ARay11

I think less of an entitlement society is better, you think more entitlements are better.

I think free cell phones are a waste of taxpayer dollars.

You think I am selfish.

I am offended.
10-10-2012, 05:51 PM
BonMallari

Quote:

Originally Posted by menmon

This whole tit for tat over right vs left is dividing americans. I think folks are better off if the dems set policy and obviously you think folks are better off if the repub are setting policy. Both sides have their strong suits, but neither has it right. At this point in history, I think a more liberal approach is best, and you disagree. That is totally ok. If your guys wins next month life will go on and mine will change very little as yours, as if my guy wins we will still get up and put our socks on in the morning.

Only real difference in us is that you think making the road easier for the well to do makes your road easier, and I think giving power to the less fortunate make more opportunity for the less fortunate.

our differences are bigger than that,too numerous to mention, and dont mean squat

You still think that the republican will control spending, and I have lived longer and know that they will just spend on the things that they think are important.

We are about the same age

Bottomline I'll be fine who ever gets elected....I just think the working man needs a better bargining position. Those are my roots and they are why I have had the sucess I've had, and I want forget that even if it cost me a few more dollars in tax

............
10-10-2012, 07:56 PM
Franco

One thing for sure, the Christian God may be a Dem or Repub but, he is not a Libertarian.
;-)
We hold that all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose.

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...91602187_n.jpg
10-11-2012, 06:57 AM
Dustin D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franco

We hold that all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose.

1- That's not really possible.

2 - That's a pretty drastic generalization that you are pushing in that picture and in fact it's absolutely false. Not all Scientist in those fields believe what that picture is saying.
10-11-2012, 01:37 PM
Pete

Quote:

http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/

I can only post a little at time
10-11-2012, 02:05 PM
Franco

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete

I can only post a little at time

Would you have a more credibile site, one that has no religious affiliations?

A federal court, along with the majority of scientific organizations, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, say the Institute has manufactured the controversy they want to teach by promoting a false perception that evolution is "a theory in crisis",^[8] through incorrectly claiming that it is the subject of wide controversy and debate within the scientific community.^[9]^[10]^[11] In 2005, a federal court ruled that the Discovery Institute pursues "demonstrably religious, cultural, and legal missions",^[8]^[10]^[12] and the institute's manifesto, the Wedge strategy,^[13] describes a religious goal: to "reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist worldview, and to replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions".^[14]^[15] It was the Federal Court's opinion that intelligent design was merely a redressing of creationism and that, as such, it was not a scientific proposition

And Dustin D, you are incorrect. People can live free and not interfer with others.
10-11-2012, 02:24 PM
HPL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete

I can only post a little at time

Along with any other problems, they need a copy editor: "During recent decades, new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology, physics, biology, "artificial intelligence" research, and others have caused scientists to begin questioning Darwinism's central tenet of natural selection and studying the evidence supporting it in greater detail."

"During recent decades, new scientific evidence .................. has ..........."

I would propose this:
"During recent decades, new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology (are you sure they didn't mean cosmetology, physics, biology, "artificial intelligence" research, and others has caused some scientists to question Darwinism's central tenet of natural selection, and begin studying the evidence supporting it in greater detail."

Of course, these folks have a clear agenda, and I personally don't agree with their point, but might not start laughing quite so soon if they knew how to write.
10-11-2012, 02:27 PM
Pals

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franco

Would you have a more credibile site, one that has no religious affiliations?

AAnd Dustin D, you are incorrect. People can live free and not interfer with others.

This used to be true in the US of A.....
10-11-2012, 03:18 PM
Dustin D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franco

And Dustin D, you are incorrect. People can live free and not interfer with others.

But that's not what you said exactly.

Quote:

the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose.

This is just not possible. There has to be a Moral Code guiding the people. If not, you are sure to run into chaos when the way I want to live crosses the way you want to live.

Truth is not relative and neither is Moral Code. There has to be rules and therefore rules will restrict people from doing what they want to do thus making your statement an impossible feat.

Without a Moral Code to follow there will be chaos.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page