Only when you take the quote out of context. Read the whole statement, not just the part you underlined!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin D
This part...
so long as they do not forcibly interfere with
Printable View
Only when you take the quote out of context. Read the whole statement, not just the part you underlined!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin D
This part...
so long as they do not forcibly interfere with
Franco
I didn't mean to post up a religious site. I was in a hurry and wasn't paying attention. I am trying to google the law or principle that basically says with the greater the lessor is done away with. I studied about it in college. But I am short on time because of being out of an area and also short on posting time due to computer settings.
I'll work on it and hopefully I can dig it up in cyber space.. Just to remind you,,I am not a religious person. I do change my thinking when I see or understand in depth what is presented,,,but from all I have learned in science (my major in college) evolution in not quite an exact science.
Pete
If someone that is more learned could expound on Dustin D's mathematical probability about the creation of such a complex organism as man from mere single cell ooze I would be interested. The mere creation of life from non-life is scientifically impossible. There are so many holes in the evolution THEORY that it is comical that so many take it as LAW. That we change or "evolve" does not evolution make. To think that we are so far ahead of all other creatures in the department of critical thinking and in the same breath not acknowledge the possible existence of a being infinitely smarter than humans is egotistical beyond reason. Any educated man must give credence to the theory of a superior being other than ourselves and to think that as impossible proves our limitations in critical thinking. The complexities of all that is natural developing from single cell organisms as evolutionary is a much tougher sell to me than the creation of all that is here from my God. To say that the believe in God is an intellectually wrong theory of our existence in my opinion is wrong. This theory is the best our feeble minds can comprehend. Accept that maybe we are not the smartest and maybe your mind will open to this possibility. Only God could have created such a planet and creatures as this that can "evolve".
Looking forward to reading it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
Do you agree that Earth is 4.5 Billion years old(not a theory) and that Homosapien has been around for 35,000 plus years? Also, that we exsist in a multi-universe?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
I for one think I pretty well understand the basic science behind the techniques used to come up with the 4.5 Billion year age of earth and the 35,000 years for homo sapiens (actually I believe that is currently thought to be between 0.5 mil and 200,000 yrs), but just can't wrap my mind around the multi-verse idea.
Star Trek was way ahead of its time!;)Quote:
Originally Posted by HPL
http://www.the-universe.ie/multi-universe.html
[QUOTE][Looking forward to reading it.
Do you agree that Earth is 4.5 Billion years old(not a theory) and that Homosapien has been around for 35,000 plus years? Also, that we exsist in a multi-universe?/QUOTE]
I suppose 4.5 could be right but they never figure in that carbon dating is affected by water and argon dating is affected by radiation. Can you post a link that shows that the dna from modern man of 35000 years ago is the same as ours. wolf chiwawa analogy.
I dont know what mutli universe is. But I do know there is a level which exists which science can not measure ,,, which is the spiritual realm. And I have witnessed and clearly measured with my senses for over 30 years. But most people can't wrap their minds around it ,,or try to offer a worldly/scientific explanation.
I love the sciences and the exploration of fossils and such,,,but to think we can explain and know what when on billions of years ago is nothing but a giant ego trip and I am reminded of worshipping the creature instead of the creator.
I don't usually get into religious discussion but this seems a good place to ask a simple question.
I have trouble understanding why the theory evolution would in some way deny the existance of a supreme creator, even if it were proved to be law. Nor do I understand why the existance of a supreme creator would in any way deny the theory of evolution. I just can't understand what the hubub is about.?
So if anyone will respond, I will just sit back and listen.:)
[QUOTEI don't usually get into religious discussion but this seems a good place to ask a simple question.
I have trouble understanding why the theory evolution would in some way deny the existance of a supreme creator, even if it were proved to be law. Nor do I understand why the existance of a supreme creator would in any way deny the theory of evolution. I just can't understand what the hubub is about.?
So if anyone will respond, I will just sit back and listen.:smile:][/QUOTE]
The word of God speak of a time line that does not include evolution. It does speak of cataclysmic events long before modern man arrived which science also agrees with but it gives a different reason for these catastrophes and it calls them something else.. Science has figured out a lot of cool things many of them plainly logged in the bible. For some hebrew guy thousands of years ago to even mention these cataclysmic events I think is remarkable. And to think there is mention of continental plate movement blows me away But Gods time line and mans time line are millions if not billions of years appart. I'll believe the guy that lived through it.
Pete
The word of God speak of a time line that does not include evolution. It does speak of cataclysmic events long before modern man arrived which science also agrees with but it gives a different reason for these catastrophes and it calls them something else.. Science has figured out a lot of cool things many of them plainly logged in the bible. For some hebrew guy thousands of years ago to even mention these cataclysmic events I think is remarkable. And to think there is mention of continental plate movement blows me away But Gods time line and mans time line are millions if not billions of years appart. I'll believe the guy that lived through it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete
Pete[/QUOTE]
Now I have done it. another queation. We use a timeline based on our solar syster and a Creator might have a time line based on the universe. Could not man have mininterpreted the Creator's time line making it insignificant? You might say that the Creator speaks to man but could you not reason that there has been a misinterpretation? Just look at the posts on this forum as an example.