Hillary on the morning news right now taking FULL responsibility.
Kinda feel sorry for her. She knows were the buck stops.
I think the White House should follow her lead.
I think she has a "bigger set" than the President, in the way she Maned up just now.
'speshaly the morning of the comming debate.
hope sombody in the town hall has a good question.
Originally Posted by Ken Bora
its all a calculated mea culpa...it was done the day before the debate and gives BHO some wiggle room, the media still loves their Hillary gal, they will gloss this over and say that she was being the true statesmen
Too Little Too Late
Shes the head of the state dept of course shes responsible now lets hear her boss say he is responsible for her! She kept him informed every step of the way
That's not gonna happen.
Originally Posted by gmhr1
Like I said in an earlier post when in charge you are responsible for everything DONE or Not Done .........Obama is Commander in Chief and he is also President so he is responsible. ....PERIOD.
Stan said it many many moons ago. Obama will take all the credit for the good but will not accept any responsibility for anything bad! Not his exact words but you get the jist.
If I had heard that it is gone from my brain now :-( She has had a very busy adult life hasn't she, vbg.
Originally Posted by Marvin S
Interesting analysis by Ed Klein in The Daily Caller dated today. He writes that his source (in the Clinton circle) indicates Clintons found cables from Hillary ordering increase in security at Benghazi, but her instructions were not followed. The piece implies that someone in the WH dropped the ball on the instructions being implemented. He suggests that if this information comes out (or is leaked), it will place responsibility firmly in the WH for this failure.
That might save Hillary to campaign another day ... but not so good for Obama. Maybe Obama also knew about these cables, and that made him offer some responsibility in advance (at the 2nd debate)? Then, later, he can say that he always took full responsibility.
These are two (three, if you count Bill guiding Hillary's actions) very sly politicians, very experienced in finest CYA. Did anyone really think Bill and Hillary would ever forgive their treatment at the hands of Obama and his group? Right from snatching the nomination in 2008 through to lack of personal contact since Obama moved into the WH.
Funny how things unfold, isn't it? If Hillary had been nominated and won in 2008, with Bill's cagey assistance, she might have come through 4 years looking competent enough to get a second term. With the Obama debacle unfolding more each day, a win now for Romney might still give the needed time to stop the bus from going over the cliff.
So you are saying that the attack on us on 9/11 was due to "NO leadership"
Originally Posted by gmhr1
Would you go so far as to say that Pres Bush and his "bunch of buffoons" should be prosecuted for their "NO leadership" that resulted in the great tradgedy and huge loss of American lives in the 9/11 attack
Originally Posted by smillerdvm
Imagine this, Russ. A fellow veterinarian wanting to make a case that 9-11 is comparable to:
Obama not even aware that he just 'might' have made too big a deal about HIS killing of Osama...
Obama not even aware of how the jihadists like to blow things up on anniversaries of 9-11...
Obama too busy campaigning to consider he's responsible for the protection at the various U.S. embassies in the Islam world...
And of course, after 9-11, Bush used a home-brewed movie as his excuse for what happened...
Comparing apples to oranges may be your way of excusing your messiah, smillerDVM. But only a complete sycophant continues to place his head where the sun don't shine, so he can avoid having to accept the fact that what he voted to put in the White House in '08, was a total inept fiasco.