Why nothing will change after the election. Only Gary Johnson has put forth a budget that reduces spending by 43% and takes on the Deficit!:mad:
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...08936054_n.jpg
Printable View
Why nothing will change after the election. Only Gary Johnson has put forth a budget that reduces spending by 43% and takes on the Deficit!:mad:
http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...08936054_n.jpg
and how would GJ or any Ind POTUS even get a budget voted on in a Dem majority Senate....Harry wont even bring a BHO budget up for a vote
How is Mitt goping to get a budget pass the Senate ot Obama pass the House?Quote:
Originally Posted by BonMallari
At least Gary Johnson would be an eye-opener and the revolution that is needed in getting this country back to The Constitution!
You might as well be talking about how my dog Tucker would bring about world peace if elected. Tucker and Johnson have the same chance of winning.We can afford to have you waste your vote in LA. Not so much in other states. I'm not sure which is more tiresome. Romney and Obama's BS or yours. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
When Mitt wins, he will have a Rep majority in both Houses...if BHO squeaks out a win, it will be 4 more years of gridlock
Gary Johnson does not have the clout or charisma to lead a revolution
At least I don't consider myself as part of the problem!;-)Quote:
Originally Posted by M&K's Retrievers
I liken the support of either Obama/Romney to a herd of Bison running off of a cliff with only a few Bison running in the opposite direction.
Of course not........since you've made yourself irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
Well, if irrelevant means thinking that;Quote:
Originally Posted by dback
We should live within a budget, with a Balanced Budget Amendment
That we should not be allowing foreign banks to control our Monetary Policy
That growing a 16 TRILLION Debt is not in our best interest
That policing the world does not serve the interest of tax payers
That we have a Constituition that needs to be followed
That we need to hold our Politicians accountable
and
that I don't follow any party blindly ignoring facts
then yes, I am irrelevant!
"The most significant threat to our national security is our debt." - Admiral Michael Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.http://money.cnn.com/2012/10/22/news...source=cnn_bin
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...87449732_n.jpg
Franco, what is this stunt you are trying to pull with thinking rationally and looking at facts? That has no place in politics, "i want to be on the winning team no matter if all my rights are stripped away" is the slogan you need to be spreading
OK......I agree 100% or nearly so on each point. Where we disagree is that I prefer to support the party that most closely reflects those values and then hold them to it as best as possible. They stand at least some reasonable chance of winning. You on the other hand, believes you will win the popular vote with a complete unknown/inexperienced and that when elected, your complete unknown will not be faced with any of the realities of the job and he will do everything and only those things that you envisioned.Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
Utopian pipe dream, therefore.....Quote:
yes, I am irrelevant!