If all 47 million food stamp recipients had voted, they would have accounted for 75% of Obama's 62 million votes.
That doesn't begin to consider all of the other entitlement programs out there.
Printable View
If all 47 million food stamp recipients had voted, they would have accounted for 75% of Obama's 62 million votes.
That doesn't begin to consider all of the other entitlement programs out there.
yeah but that is not what happened
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/20...=sunday-review
New figures for unemployment claims, out today, are up 78,000. That's a BIG jump over the last report. While CA had been up to date on reporting, OR and HI were not, so that accounted for part of the jump. (The previous report "estimated" what OR and HI would be). NJ applications are up a lot for the newest report. One things it would be as a result of Sandy ... but NY applications are not as dramatically higher. But the highest number of new applications are for ... OH and PA. With the war on coal just beginning, I'd expect that will continue to get worse. Makes you begin to wonder about the timing on this info, doesn't it?
New figures out now indicate contraction of manufacturing in October ... including the auto industry.
Guess OH voters really did get suckered. PA has been a blue state for a long time, so not as surprising. Maybe the results of the war on coal will get their attention next time? And maybe the EPA will have begun leaning on fracking as well.
Of course not... That's why the thread is titled Food stamps for thought... To encourage thought.Quote:
Originally Posted by PamK
The only groups I've heard of that voted totally 100% lockstep were the 50 some odd Philly divisions that did not tally a single Romney vote.
They were willing suckers...useful idiots more or less. Obama's "Rules for Radicals" methodology works on those who don't mind being led by the nose...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry Clinchy
Foodstamps are your code word for black lazy person.
You are so full of crap your eyes are brownQuote:
Originally Posted by menmon
Mike, your response makes YOU appear as a racist. When are you going to learn to leave it alone while you are behind. You will never be ahead or a winner. Winer maybe, but never a winner.Quote:
Originally Posted by menmon
My opinion
Richard
Thats about as BIGOTED a statement that has ever been uttered here on POTUSQuote:
Originally Posted by menmon
Your right...it is hard to win against stupidity.
Romney said today that he lost because Obama bought the election. Last time I got a count the man raised more moneyu than Obama so it clearly was not for sale. Albeit the republicans thought it was.
So this post is trying to say that people turned out and voted for him for foodstamps.....but someone will rebut this with more stupidity....just wait