That was out of line.
I NEVER said she self inflicted her leg/brain clot!!!
No they are not like me.
No need in apologizing to me as long as we can ALL keep it above board.
You have made some excellent points in your posts. While there are so many unanswered questions, I am focusing on these two.
1. Congress has asked, but has not been told, how many survivors, where they are, or who they are. It is obvious that the Secretary of State and the White House do not want them interviewed. We can only speculate as to what the survivors might be able to tell. My questions would be ... who was at the safe house and what was it being used for? Why was the ambassador at Benghazi ?
2. 4 months later and only 1 person was apprehended (in Tunisia) and he was let go by the Tunisians.
1/27/13 I changed my avatar. Now I am using a photo of Don with our Flyway's Long Tall Sally.
I try to be polite to everyone on this Forum. If your comment was meant to be an insult to my intelligence, I commend you on your success.
I did not imply an insult to your intelligence. Merely a challenge to your first hand experience in situations such as Bengahzi.
BTW nothing in regards to Bengahzi has been well documented. Hence my comment with regards to relying on information gleaned from the internet. JD
As for getting facts from the Internet ... fewer and fewer people read news in print anymore. Broadcast news, newsprint, and internet are the way most of us get most of our news information. It can take sifting through it to find what things are unsubstantiated.
I am still wondering where the other survivors of Benghazi are ... the two former SEALS were not the only ones at the CIA annex. There were Libyan militia who were supposed to be protecting the ambassador's compound.
JD, do you really believe that there was no incompetence and/or cover-up in this whole affair? Now, Hillary and the administration are saying that AQ and/or related groups are far from "defeated" ... yet they didn't know this on Sept. 11? If that is true, then the intelligence network is really pretty bad. Personally, I think they did know, but didn't want to interfere with the campaign that was trumpeting that AQ was in retreat.
2. Nothing has been well documented because your political heroes choose to give the American people the Proverbial Middle Finger. (See Hillary Clinton's clot impudent "testimony" before Senate and Congress)
This happens to be from Townhall today, but the father of one of the former SEALs attested to it publicly, as I recall.Quote:
But just to be clear, Clinton lied and is still lying.
When asked about the claim that the attack was sparked by a protest over a video, she responded, "I did not say ... that it was about the video for Libya."
That's simply untrue. When she stood by the caskets of the four Americans killed in Libya, she directly blamed an "awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with." Afterward, she reportedly told the father of Tyrone Woods, the former Navy SEAL who was killed in the attack, "We will make sure the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted." Why tell the man that if the video had nothing to do with it?
Wouldn't this, alone, be considered perjury in front of the Congressional Committee?
It's been a while since I have viewed the ad she did for ME distribution about the insulting video story, so I don't remember if the wording artfully avoided direct mention of Benghazi ... but she certainly did apologize for the video. It might have been carefully worded to appear to refer only to the attack on the embassy in Egypt. That ad was aired after they had ample time to determine that the video was not the cause of the Benghazi event.