Oh, and don't forget, women don't need guns for protection, they have whistles and safe zones.
This is really funny ...
It's all so simple...just follow your nearby bleeding heart lib.
Gun Free Zone Solution to Violence
For all the fuss made about Akin's stupid comment during the fall campaign, nobody bats an eye over this:
Advice to women from Colorado University include this nugget:Quote:
“It’s why we have call boxes, it’s why we have safe zones, it’s why we have the whistles. Because you just don’t know who you’re gonna be shooting at. And you don’t know if you feel like you’re gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around or if you feel like you’re in trouble when you may actually not be, that you pop out that gun and you pop … pop around at somebody.”
Well, after all, you might not get raped. In Salazar’s world, not only are women incapable of defending themselves against a physical threat, but they are incapable of even identifying a physical threat, and should therefore be deprived of the ability to try. Empowerment! I guess if you are raped, there’s this…safe zone. Look, colleges are welcome to establish safe zones (though criminals are notoriously unobservant of such signage), call boxes, lighted paths, and whistles to help prevent campus attacks. I have benefited from at least a few of these tools, and begrudge no one their use. But I would also like women who choose to arm themselves, in the event that safe zones, call boxes, lights, and whistles don’t work, to retain the right to their chosen tool of prevention.
Vomiting or urinating may also convince the attacker to leave you alone.
Serious Question--- Should we as sportsman and sportswomen - boycott hunting in Colorado?
Are we hitting them (State Government) where they hurt or are we hurting our allies??