Let's get this straight, is Obama to blame for terrorists attacking the consulate? No. Is his administration at fault for not protecting the consulate as it should have been? Probably, and there are many reasons for that. The real problem here, and I think some people are losing sight of this, is not that Bengazhi happened (terrorist attacks happen and will continue to, we can only learn from this and do better) is that a story was put out and endorsed many times over weeks and weeks as fact that it was a spontaneous attack and not a terrorist planned op. Which, by the best intelligence, we have learned, was reported as a coordinated terrorist attack by our operatives on the ground in Benghazi. So ask yourself, no, really, ask yourself why would the best intelligence be cast aside in favor of the spontaneous protest story. Whether it was done by the CIA, the Obama administration, or the State Dept, my opinion was it was clearly done for political reason. That's where the accountability lies. That is what is important. What difference does it make? Good one, right? It makes a difference in that we cannot have, nor should we tolerate lies from our highest level officials in government, which are espoused for purely political gain. Sure, it happens all the time......but we need to stop accepting it. I really get a kick out of some of you people on here, spewing babbling jokes about the "farces of the Republicans". Do you really prefer any party to do whatever they want and not be questioned on those actions? I think we need more of that, left or right or whatever, bring on the investigations.