Proven producer vs Hot competitor?
The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Wildear
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Proven producer vs Hot competitor?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Houston,TX
    Posts
    1,448

    Default Proven producer vs Hot competitor?

    Am I noticing a trend in the demand for competitive puppies swinging towards litters sired by the hot young FC/AFC studs that are winning on the circuits vs the proven producers?
    Last edited by David Maddox; 05-08-2014 at 06:12 AM.
    We are only as good as those that surround us.

    Birthplace to:
    •'09 National Finalist FC-BAYOU TECHE TEX
    •FC-BUTCH's DREAM CODE of TCR
    •FC-DREAM DANCIN'
    Gettin' Jiggy Widdit-MH
    Dancin' Dreamer Kate-MH (dam to FC-"FINN", several QAAs, 2-MNHs)

    RIP Jiggy, Kate, and sweet mama Dancy!!!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    358

    Default

    With unproven studs or proven also- I look at the quality of the parents, and the grandparents. Hopefully all 6 were outstanding dogs. Then I look at siblings. I want dogs who are strong performers with strong litter mates. Same with the parents- strong dogs from strong litters.

    I am unlikely to breed to a stud who is the only dog who did anything in his litter, or who has parents who weren't from solid litters.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Houston,TX
    Posts
    1,448

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhnnythndr View Post
    With unproven studs or proven also- I look at the quality of the parents, and the grandparents. Hopefully all 6 were outstanding dogs. Then I look at siblings. I want dogs who are strong performers with strong litter mates. Same with the parents- strong dogs from strong litters.

    I am unlikely to breed to a stud who is the only dog who did anything in his litter, or who has parents who weren't from solid litters.
    I agree. Nice response.
    We are only as good as those that surround us.

    Birthplace to:
    •'09 National Finalist FC-BAYOU TECHE TEX
    •FC-BUTCH's DREAM CODE of TCR
    •FC-DREAM DANCIN'
    Gettin' Jiggy Widdit-MH
    Dancin' Dreamer Kate-MH (dam to FC-"FINN", several QAAs, 2-MNHs)

    RIP Jiggy, Kate, and sweet mama Dancy!!!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    246

    Default

    I think the current trend is seeking EIC clear vs proven producers or proven competitors...

  5. #5
    Senior Member John Lash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pa.
    Posts
    2,224

    Default

    Aren't the hot young competitors of today the proven producers of tomorrow and vice versa?
    John Lash

    "If you run Field Trials, you learn to swallow your disappointment quickly."

    "Field trials are not a game for good dogs. They're for great dogs with great training." E. Graham

  6. #6
    Senior Member Mike Tome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Brunswick, MD
    Posts
    1,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon Bromley View Post
    I think the current trend is seeking EIC clear vs proven producers or proven competitors...
    What makes you say this? I think the current trend in competitive dogs at least is proven producers or competitors that are have health clearances. I know some are looking for EIC clear, but there are also many breedings of EIC clear to carrier. This whole issue has been beat to death on RTF. Of course, its still the wild, wild west in many BY breedings where the owners don't give a hoot about any health clearances.
    Mike Tome
    Duckdog's Fast Autofocus
    GMHRCH-III WR North Star's Deuce of Diamonds

    MHR WR Pondview's Bar None 1994-2006

    Duckdogphotography.smugmug.com


  7. #7
    Senior Member Charles C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Marshall, TX
    Posts
    1,687

    Default

    I think my definition of a proven producer is a little different than some others. If a dog doesn't have a real record as a consistent producers why not go with a less proven, but exceptional sire?

  8. #8
    Member Ethompson63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    79

    Default

    And you have to remember someone always has to be the first. Sires aren't born proven reproducers.

  9. #9
    Senior Member John Robinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bigfork, Montana
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Lash View Post
    Aren't the hot young competitors of today the proven producers of tomorrow and vice versa?
    Not necessarily, I know of some very good FC-AFC's that never really passed on their great genes when bred. On the other hand I have seen certain dogs just click and produce great dogs from multiple litters, even though they hadn't achieved much in the way of titles.

  10. #10
    Senior Member .44 magnum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,526

    Default

    I would want to use the Sire of the Hot new competitor .
    “I like one-shot kills where possible and prefer to do all my hunting before I shoot.” ..... Elmer Keith



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •