Well its over GDG

[Arturo]

I say something real (except the gas and mortgage stuff)and you start making stuff up. What's up with that? Or maybe that is some more real stuff I am just finding out about today. Thank you. I will start adding them to my list of Obama policies as soon as I can verify them. Help me out here, where do I need to go to verify these policies?

[YardleyLabs]

"This is relevant to us in a lot of ways and more threatening to us than an Obama Administration could ever be. But most urgent is in our towns here. In Dearborn Michigan where the Islamic population is growing they asked that teh bells of Christian churches be silenced on Sundays.

They are at war with us and we are in denial."

Sorry, could not get the "quote" thing to work. We may still have freedon of religion - however, we cannot have prayer in schools, no prayer before an athletic event, In God we Trust is being removed from a lot of places, the ten commandments are no longer allowed in a lot of the courts, and now the Muslims do not want church bells on Sunday. Seems like "religious freedom" is not as free as it once was. As a Christian I resent the minority telling me I can't have these freedoms.

I had heard a lot of controversy about a city council decision to permit a local mosque to broadcast a call to prayer 5x daily during specified hours and subject to noise restrictions, and heard the statement that denying that privilege would be equivalent to denying churches the right to ring their bells. I had not heard of a specific proposal to ban church bells otherwise. I also head that some people wanted church bells to be permitted because they were "not religious" but that the call to prayer should be banned because it is religious (That I don't understand). What's the story? Personally, I have lived in countries where I heard church bells ring every hour as well as for calls to services, and I have spent time in places where there was a call to prayers five times a day. I am not religious, but found them equally non-irritating as long as the noise levels were not excessive. It seems to me that under our constitution one would either have to permit both or ban both.

[Steve Amrein]

So tell me how long does BHO have before he is responsible for his actions and the countries status.

Now before you answer remember it is W's fault for 911


In that time frame we should have all the bailout money spent. Wall street regulated. The troops will be home.

[precisionlabradors]

he was responsible for it on 911 because is a terrorist too. duh.
________
Ferrari 360

[gsc]

Please restate, I am not able to understand your sentence.

[Steve Hester]

he was responsible for it on 911 because is a terrorist too. duh.

Let me understand something. You want everybody to join hands and sing Cumbayah with Obama and his followers, while you refer to Bush as a terrorist?? If so, I honestly think you have lost your mind.

[Granddaddy]

lol.

sniffle sniffle........

so the question is, are the republicans here going to do their patriotic part now to try and unify the country, or cry over spilt milk, pout, and continue to fear-monger and remain divisive?

what do mccain supporters plan to do now to unify the country you have stated over and over that you love.

And the answer is.......pay taxes & more of them.......

[Steve]

Socialism - spreading the wealth from those who don't need it to those who do.

Taxes - spreading the wealth around from those who don't need it to those who do.

It is one thing to tax people disproportionately based on income (which I oppose) for roads, parks, military, etc and entirely something else to take money from one person and just give it to another.

The biggest problem with that thought process is who gets to decide who needs what and who doesn't. Maybe we should all vote on each other's income

[Steve]

I am most disappointed is how the Republican Party has let me down in the past 16 years.

how can you explain the shift in power from the Republican Party, to the Democrat Party? Have you looked at your IRA or 401k statements? Mine is down 35%. Obama didn’t have anything to do with that!

The Republicans failed because they acted like Democrats. They abandoned fiscally conservative principles. They allowed the democrats to define them as the "extreme right wing" and place the blame for the economy on lack of regulation.

It is the principles of social engineering, in which Obama has championed, which are the primary responsibility for the financial crisis. It was government putting pressure on lenders to make loans to people who wouldn't otherwise qualify that initiated the whole thing. That McCain failed to highlight this in his campaign was just one more indication to me that he was an extremely weak candidate. I don't know of a single person who had any enthusiasm for McCain. Those who voted for him did so to oppose Obama.

[RedHeadedHurricane]

he was responsible for it on 911 because is a terrorist too. duh.

Somebodies cheese has done slid off their cracker!