Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly etc

[Hoosier]

Saddam wouldn't allow the F*&^ing inspectors in. They were shooting at our jets. They were in violation of numerous UN resolutions. They were buying off members of the UN security council something had to be done, the US had the balls to do it. That was before the liberals neutered us.

[Buzz]

Saddam wouldn't allow the F*&^ing inspectors in.

Really? I mean F*&^ing REALLY?

And I thought that the one's that marked the oval for Obama were the misinformed ones.

http://mediabloodhound.typepad.com/w...al-report.html

[IowaBayDog]

We didn't "find" that stuff as a result of the current invasion. We knew it was there as a result of the Desert Shield/Storm. I'm suprised as an Intel you don't know that.

Sorry to hear about your co-worker, Danny. Is this lingering effects from Desert Shield/Storm or did your co-worker suffer this as a result of the current event?
Analyst


Oh, so now we invaded Iraq to get the chemical weapons. Again, WE KNEW HE HAD CHEMICAL WEAPONS. If I remember correctly, we gave them the stuff when they were fighting Iran and we were supporting him.



So, how was the hunting?

Best Regards,

Joe S.

The hunting was a bust, ice now has taken over the first couple hundred yards of Lake Michigan. Lots of geese still around but no longer in season. I was coming to visit family, the hunting was only a bonus, luckily I scouted prior to buying a license.

He wounds are from this latest war not the early 90s. He was over there for the 1st 2 years.

We knew it was there from Desert Storm, and it was found in the latest war as well. But we KNEW it was there, thanks for admitting that, WMDs includes all elements of NBC, not just the "N".

[subroc]

It appears taking control of WMD doesn't count. Only finding new stockpiles above and beyond all that they currently had is enough for those on the left.

I guess we couldnt be attacked with weapons we knew were there.

[JS]

President Bush defended his decision to go into Iraq in many ways, but I don't recall him ever announcing that we did find WMDs.

I may be showing my ignorance here, and I do take occasional trips to the boonies just to get away from this kind of stuff, but what did I miss?

JS

[subroc]

President Bush defended his decision to go into Iraq in many ways, but I don't recall him ever announcing that we did find WMDs.

I may be showing my ignorance here, and I do take occasional trips to the boonies just to get away from this kind of stuff, but what did I miss?

JS

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,376747,00.html

BTW, if you lean left, your expected to dismiss this with the belief that because it was identified prior to our military action, it doesn’t matter.

Easy enough to get on board now.

[JS]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,376747,00.html

BTW, if you lean left, your expected to dismiss this with the belief that because it was identified prior to our military action, it doesn’t matter.

Easy enough to get on board now.

From the FOX NEWS story:

While yellowcake alone is not considered potent enough for a so-called "dirty bomb" — a conventional explosive that disperses radioactive material — it could stir widespread panic if incorporated in a blast. Yellowcake also can be enriched for use in reactors and, at higher levels, nuclear weapons using sophisticated equipment.

This has been discussed before. As I asked earlier, if President Bush considered this a WMD, why has he not been shouting it out from the highest hill in his attempts to defend his position on the Iraq war??

I believed what Bush told us prior to the invasion. I reluctantly supported his decision and was fearful our troops would be wading into a chemical cloud. Didn't happen. Even he says he was duped by the intelligence he received. (well, maybe not in those exact words)

JS

[subroc]

Does that mean you are on board? Issue dismissed?

How about the chemical weapons that were found?

You can dismiss those as well.

[JS]

Does that mean you are on board? Issue dismissed?

How about the chemical weapons that were found?

You can dismiss those as well.

Don't know exactly what you mean by "on board".

IMO, when the material was discovered is irrelevant.

Bush said we would find weapons of mass destruction. Per the FOX NEWS article, "yellowcake alone is not considered potent enough for a so-called dirty bomb". It is not a weapon and I think the president agrees or he would have been saying, "see! I told you so! I told you so!".

The people were told the threat was imminent. It was not and the president has acknowledged that, saying the intelligence he got was faulty. He then began to justify the war on other points.

He's not using WMDs to justify the war. Why are you guys still doing it?

JS

[subroc]

You asked, I gave you the info, and it is apparently unimportant to you.

Issue dismissed!

No longer relevent...