If you bought his pledge for change, in Jan. 08 he pledged to not have to not have the same Washington insiders. Instead of the promised change new appointments of about 40 are 75 % the Clinton era.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
If you bought his pledge for change, in Jan. 08 he pledged to not have to not have the same Washington insiders. Instead of the promised change new appointments of about 40 are 75 % the Clinton era.
Last edited by Richard Halstead; 12-07-2008 at 08:41 PM.
cave canem...beware of the dog
Richard Halstead (halst001 at yahoo.com)
http://www.browndogmafia.com/finalists.html
I keep my PM box full. Use email to contact me: rockytopkg@aol.com.
I hope you didn't vote for BO based on that thought. There are only so many individuals capable of, & with the stature, to get his administration off the ground. Remember BO is not a person with a wealth of successful experience to draw upon. The only agenda where he was in charge which included ample funding, besides the successful run for POTUS, was a failure.
I've heard a lot of weak excuses why individuals voted the way they did, this one while not falling into that category shows a certain naivete about the system.
Of all the appointments made to date, it is hard to find fault with any other than the AG, though we may find over time some are just not up to the task. Eric Holder was the prime mover, so rumor has it, in the Marc Rich pardon. Not a good start for the office that is supposed to be above reproach.
Richard, You have a nice day.![]()
![]()
__________________________
Marvin S
It is certain that the number of those who reason well in difficult matters is much smaller then the number of those who reason badly ........ reasoning is like running & unlike carrying, hence one Arab steed will outrun a hundred jackasses.
Everyone's friend is No One's friend