What I say is that I used an example that I suspect most of us, including me, would consider completely appropriate (being a Board member for the NRA) to show that the criticism of Solis' relationship to a labor group is based on disagreement with the purpose of the group rather than disagreement with having a congressman serve of the Board of a non-profit, politically active organization. As was noted in an earlier post, the opposition doesn't pass the smell test.
Personally, I was a member of the NRA for ten years. I quit when the NRA decided that it was more important to pursue a radical conservative agenda on a broad front than to address issues of gun ownership and gun training without regard to other issues. When Wayne LaPierre and similar idiots are gone, I will rejoin.











Reply With Quote



