The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Outdoor Media
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: EPA Concludes that greenhouse gases are a danger to public health

  1. #1
    Senior Member Sabireley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Culpeper VA
    Posts
    1,078

    Default EPA Concludes that greenhouse gases are a danger to public health

    “The Environmental Protection Agency has concluded that carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases are a danger to public health and welfare, taking the first step to regulating pollution linked to climate change, The Associated Press has learned.

    Such regulation would have widespread economic and social impact, from requiring more fuel efficient automobiles to limiting carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and industrial sources, changing the way the nation produces energy.

    The EPA has concluded that the science pointing to man-made pollution as a cause of global warming is “compelling and overwhelming.” The blame goes mainly to carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels.”



    Here comes more government meddling...er... I mean helpful programs.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    620

    Default

    We are so screwed. The druid environmentalists have won.
    Kelly, Weis, Willingham, & Davies

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tulsa
    Posts
    683

    Default

    H2O vaper is one of the worst greenhouse gasses. It is many times more effective than CO2.

    We exhale both when we breath.
    Terry Britton, P.E.

    Engineers believe that if it isn't broken, it doesn't have enough features yet.

  4. #4
    Senior Member JDogger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    MRGV New Mexico
    Posts
    3,327

    Default

    One cannot reason someone out of something they were not reasoned into. - Jonathan Swift

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tulsa
    Posts
    683

    Default

    Look at the brite side, the EPA may cause congress to do less talking and more work fixing problems, and making sure the laws are on the books (such as gun laws and democrats paying taxes) are enforced. The EPA won't ever get a chance to leave Washington.
    Terry Britton, P.E.

    Engineers believe that if it isn't broken, it doesn't have enough features yet.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Detroit Lakes, MN
    Posts
    1,438

    Default

    Just in case some folks were unaware of some of the history on this, here is fact from FOX news at http://www.foxnews.com/politics/firs...limate-change/
    Friday's finding was prompted by a Supreme Court ruling two years that said greenhouse gases are pollutants under the Clean Air Act and must be regulated if found to be a human health danger.

  7. #7
    Senior Member twall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,119

    Default

    The The Fox article begins with a quote of the "compelling" data. However, compelling is not conclusive. This is a case of justifying the results you want.

    My question is how are the greenhouse gases a danger to public health? What diseases/causes of death are being increased by the atmospheric levels of thses gases? What are the leading causes of worldwide mortality? US mortality?

    US life expectancy will be increased much more by spending dollars on lifestyle changes that reduce smoking, drinking, over-eating and extramarital sex. It will also dramatically reduce healthcare costs. I heard the statistic recently that 50% of all healthcare dollars are spent on care that is caused by lifestyle induced diseases.

    Tom
    Tom Wall

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tulsa
    Posts
    683

    Default

    It is interesting that they don't report on the many engineers leaving the EPA over unethical emails coming down from those in charge that basically state to ignore laws and regulations that might slow down businesses and ventures of minorities and those with protected business status.
    Terry Britton, P.E.

    Engineers believe that if it isn't broken, it doesn't have enough features yet.

Similar Threads

  1. EPA policitcizing new standards?
    By TXduckdog in forum POTUS Place - For those who talk Politics in the Gallery!
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-06-2009, 06:13 PM
  2. Need for stricter EPA emissions?
    By Roger Perry in forum POTUS Place - For those who talk Politics in the Gallery!
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-24-2009, 11:24 AM
  3. Danger
    By john fallon in forum RTF - Retriever Training Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 04:38 PM
  4. Bush hogging danger GDG
    By Pals in forum RTF - Retriever Training Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-03-2008, 12:07 PM
  5. Training Equipment Fire Danger
    By afdahl in forum RTF - Retriever Training Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-12-2008, 08:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •