The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Gun Dog Broker
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: Where Is The Outrage ?

  1. #21
    Senior Member Julie R.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Orlean VA
    Posts
    2,760

    Default

    He kinda looks like James Brown, but without that shake your booty fervor. Ole Al is a buffoon. Still, Al + Outrage go together like a hand & glove, can't think of one without the other!

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    2,721

    Default

    So Pete, if I understand you people either agree with you or they are delusional -- drugged by the magic flute of the pied piper. Does that mean we need to be "cured" by the undrugged few whether we wish it or not? Is there no room for reasoned people to disagree?
    No Jeff
    I don't think many people think like me. I have actually been training my mind to think a certain way. This way I cannot be broke

    I actually accept alot of different opinions and actually I hate to admit it but I think about alot of the stuff you say.I even accept yours and your right to live your way and think like you think. I think what you say is well thought out from your perspective. But I'll be dammed if someone tries to take my liberties away for their cause.

    The constitution affords us the same rights and we can choose how to apply them in our lives. . BUT I approach things from a conservative/liberaterian/bible bending sort of way.

    The reason though you see,,,that you have great admiration for our current government is that you are socialist minded and think things from that perspective. I tend to be a traditionalist and think anything less than up holding every jot and title of the constitution is mutany and treason. And by golly I'm allowed to think that and I'm right

    I have no idea how liberals can't see what is taking place right before their eyes Actually I can. When I say Liberals I am speaking in general not all incusive. So you shouldn't take anything personal unless the shoe fits.

    In some ways we need to turn to Iran to see how to solve some of our problems. It may be old school but its proven to work. They don't mess around and we shouldn't either.
    Your planetary government is soon to arrive. And the'll remove my tongue and take my ammo and I'm sure their is a perfectly rational liberal explanation for that since the constitution will no longer exist except only in the hearts and minds of those that love it. And we will all be labeled insane. Remeber what was up is now down and what was east is now west.
    Of course this is only my opinion. Which we all know is way outdated

    I garrentee you Jeff that most US citizens sit and drool as they stare off into oblivian. Nothing else explains Obama's popularity

    Pete

  3. #23
    Senior Member cotts135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Watertown NY
    Posts
    697

    Default

    Now about this Nancy Pelosi controversy. First I would like to point out that what she said about the CIA as far as I can see is not illegal

    Secondly it seems that some of the loudest voices that are critical of her comments actually have in the past said the same things but just in different words.

    Pete Hoekstra in 2001 commenting on 2001 shooting of a plane carrying a American missonary in Peru

    "This issue goes to the heart of the American people's ability to trust the CIA," the Michigan lawmaker said Thursday. "Americans deserve to know that agencies given the power to operate on their behalf aren't abusing that power or their trust."
    Or last year commenting on Negotiations with North Korea

    "We regret to say the administration has deliberately attempted to sideline Congress in the fear that providing us with information about the North Korean regime's continuing lies and reckless behavior would undermine the current diplomatic approach."
    Then we have this from House Minority Leader Boehner while talking about The CIA's report in the National Intelligence report on Iran

    "Either I don't have confidence in what they told me several months ago or I don't have confidence in what they're telling me today."
    The CIA and Congress have had a long history of disagreements on how the agency should be run. Congress by law has oversight responsibility of the CIA and when they feel that things are not as they are being told they should question the veracity of those statements. This holier than thou belief that the CIA is above reproach is just plain nonsense.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Julie R.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Orlean VA
    Posts
    2,760

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cotts135 View Post
    The CIA and Congress have had a long history of disagreements on how the agency should be run. Congress by law has oversight responsibility of the CIA and when they feel that things are not as they are being told they should question the veracity of those statements. This holier than thou belief that the CIA is above reproach is just plain nonsense.
    I don't think anyone here was saying the CIA is above reproach or that no one in Congress has ever questioned Agency actions. This is a he said, she said type deal where she said the CIA was lying instead of coming up with some other equally lame but less offensive excuse.

    And c'mon Cotts, I know you're a liberal but this woman is a moron who thinks she's a demi god beyond reproach. She's equally if not more narcissistic than Obomo.

  5. #25
    Senior Member cotts135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Watertown NY
    Posts
    697

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julie R. View Post
    I don't think anyone here was saying the CIA is above reproach or that no one in Congress has ever questioned Agency actions. This is a he said, she said type deal where she said the CIA was lying instead of coming up with some other equally lame but less offensive excuse.

    And c'mon Cotts, I know you're a liberal but this woman is a moron who thinks she's a demi god beyond reproach. She's equally if not more narcissistic than Obomo.
    Julie what I have seen is this self righteous indignation from people on the right that the CIA should not be questioned as though these people are saints. It has been framed such that we should trust the CIA more than Pelosi. I am not a big fan of hers and her story has alot of holes in it, and maybe we should believe the CIA in this case,I don't have the answer to that.What I am saying though is because Congress has oversight authority they should question what the CIA tells them and if they feel they were misled they should say that also without being attacked by their political enemy's for strictly political purposes.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    2,721

    Default

    Because they have no honor or integrity
    Thats right.
    Honor and integrety are no longer nurtured in our society. Getting as much as you can without regards for other people is the mentality of today. And who can we prey on next.

    Its funny when you think about it. All my life I would listen to different people talk about global this and global that and thought they were conspiritcy nuts. Now most of my life later,,,,what they talked about is coming to pass. my father and grandmother saw it comming 90 years ago.

    The arrival of the federal researve bank,,Fed income tax, the stock market crash,,social security.
    These were the begginings of a global plan made manifest.

    And its taken less than a hundred years to bring down a great nation from a sickness from within our own borders. The sickness is called greed and an absence of integrety for an antidote.
    I believe we are in the forth stage of this disease.


    People have ,,piece by piece,,subtilty by subtilty sold this once great nation down the drain.

    I don't need alot of fancy computer skills to click on links to figure this out
    Most of what you'll see is deception anyway.

    Pete

  7. #27
    Senior Member Keith Farmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    waycross, georgia united states
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    my father and grandmother saw it comming 90 years ago.



    Pete,

    Daniel saw this "coming" when he penned under divine inspiration his self titled book in, as most conservative/traditional scholars believe, the years 605 to 562 BC.

    Further, the Apostle John, while exiled on the island of Patmos, detailed with startling vividness these very times we are living in now. The problem is that we now live in an era where relativism has in effect crippled logic thereby destroying any sense of meaningful debate between evolutionary minded people and creation-by-God minded people. There remains no common ground where reason can work. Only a renewing of minds will result in intelligble communication as there can be no reconciliation of the two differing world views. Once logic is lost retreat in to absurdety is all that remains...

    The hope of nations is our Lord Jesus Christ.


    .
    In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth (Gen 1:1 NKJV)... 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. 4 In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. (John 1:1-4NKJV)

    No evolution, no monkey ancestors, no big bang!

  8. #28
    Senior Member Franco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Lafayette, La.
    Posts
    10,125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cotts135 View Post

    Now about this Nancy Pelosi controversy. First I would like to point out that what she said about the CIA as far as I can see is not illegal


    .
    So, Democrats think it is OK for the speaker to lie twice to the American people? Then again, integrity is a foreign concept in DC.

    If she doesn't get canned, it may be a good thing. Thats because the Dems might actually replace her with someone intelligent and effective.
    The Libertarian Party believes that all persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. A call for the repeal of the income tax, abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes. LP.org

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,246

    Default

    What interest would it serve the DEMOCRAT leader of the CIA to come out against Pelosi? You realize that he is a democrat through and through and even he can see that Pelosi is lying.

  10. #30
    Senior Member cotts135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Watertown NY
    Posts
    697

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Booty View Post
    So, Democrats think it is OK for the speaker to lie twice to the American people? Then again, integrity is a foreign concept in DC.

    If she doesn't get canned, it may be a good thing. Thats because the Dems might actually replace her with someone intelligent and effective.
    No...............Democrats nor anyone else thinks it is a good thing for are politicians to lie to the people. It is impossible at this point to know who may be lying...............unless you have some info I don't have.

Similar Threads

  1. Outrage..>>>>GDG>>>>
    By badbullgator in forum RTF - Retriever Training Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 04-18-2007, 10:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •