Need for stricter EPA emissions?

[Blackstone]

Well, I'm doing my part to reduce green house gases. I'm eating as many cows as I can!

[kjrice]

Too many to name and really not worth my time to explain to a liberal with blinders. Enjoy the read.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/po...-41102202.html

http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom112.htm

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10486.html

http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom120.htm

http://www.stopgreenwashing.org/

[limiman12]

No one with a sense of humor?

Would be funny if livestock associations weren't having to spend money to prevent such BS. there are those that would have all of us be vegetarian, by the way the same groups that are after livestock production are after our hunting rights.

On a similar note the EPA was tryin gto pass some law that would place a limit on the dust that a combine could produce. I am confused, if we can't raise cows, and we can't combine soybeans what are we supposed to eat

[YardleyLabs]

Too many to name and really not worth my time to explain to a liberal with blinders. Enjoy the read.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/po...-41102202.html

http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom112.htm

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10486.html

http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom120.htm

http://www.stopgreenwashing.org/

I'm not sure why this is a concern. Polluting the environment and destroying the beauty of our country has been rewarded with handsome profits and little liability for decades. The only way to reduce pollution is to make it profitable to be environmentally sound. I hope that the potential for profit attracts large number of future millionaires into the business of reducing pollution.

[kjrice]

I'm not sure why this is a concern. Polluting the environment and destroying the beauty of our country has been rewarded with handsome profits and little liability for decades. The only way to reduce pollution is to make it profitable to be environmentally sound. I hope that the potential for profit attracts large number of future millionaires into the business of reducing pollution.

Reducing pollution is fine. It is the intentions of those like Gore and his ilk that use it as a front for something else.

[Uncle Bill]

Reducing pollution is fine. It is the intentions of those like Gore and his ilk that use it as a front for something else.

Not to mention the glaring hypocrisy of 'his ilk', and Algore himself. What a sleezy piece of garbage he has become. Makes the word "environmentalist" filthy.

WTF ARE YOU AFTER ALGORE???

UB

[kjrice]

Not to mention the glaring hypocrisy of 'his ilk', and Algore himself. What a sleezy piece of garbage he has become. Makes the word "environmentalist" filthy.

WTF ARE YOU AFTER ALGORE???

UB

Tom DeWeese writes an article that sheds some light. It is the 9th paragraph down. http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom112.htm

"Global warming has been the most convenient threat upon which all of the rhetoric has been based. What it is really leading to is the creation of a new economy based on trading carbon credits. Such policy is really nothing more than a massive redistribution of the wealth scheme designed to force industrial nations to make deals with less developed ones to trade for energy credits and get around severe energy use restrictions. It's what Al Gore trades in order to allow him to claim he has a "zero carbon footprint" - even as he flies around the world in his jets and pays $2000 electric bills on his Tennessee mansion. In the end, the same emissions are released into the atmosphere, but money and power exchanges hands from the industrial nations to the less developed. Where is the protection for the environment? Of course there isn't any."