The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Outdoor Media
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: EPA policitcizing new standards?

  1. #1
    Senior Member TXduckdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    632

    Default EPA policitcizing new standards?

    'In recent years, many Americans have had cause to wonder whether decisions made at EPA were guided by science and the law, or whether those principles had been trumped by politics," declared Lisa Jackson in San Francisco last week. The Environmental Protection Agency chief can't stop kicking the Bush Administration, but the irony is that the Obama EPA is far more "political" than the Bush team ever was.

    How else to explain the coordinated release on Wednesday of the EPA's new rules that make carbon a dangerous pollutant and John Kerry's cap-and-trade bill? Ms. Jackson is issuing a political ultimatum to business, as well as to Midwestern and rural Democrats: Support the Kerry-Obama climate tax agenda—or we'll punish your utilities and consumers without your vote.

    The EPA has now formally made an "endangerment finding" on CO2, which will impose the command-and-control regulations of the Clean Air Act across the entire economy. Because this law was never written to apply to carbon, the costs will far exceed those of a straight carbon tax or even cap and trade—though judging by the bills Democrats are stitching together, perhaps not by much. In any case, the point of this reckless "endangerment" is to force industry and politicians wary of raising taxes to concede, lest companies have to endure even worse economic and bureaucratic destruction from the EPA.

    Ms. Jackson made a show of saying her new rules would only apply to some 10,000 facilities that emit more than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide each year, as if that were a concession. These are the businesses—utilities, refineries, heavy manufacturers and so forth—that have the most to lose and are therefore most sensitive to political coercion.

    The idea is to get Exelon and other utilities to lobby Congress to pass a cap-and-trade bill that gives them compensating emissions allowances that they can sell to offset the cost of the new regulations. White House green czar Carol Browner was explicit on the coercion point last week, telling a forum hosted by the Atlantic Monthly that the EPA move would "obviously encourage the business community to raise their voices in Congress." In Sicily and parts of New Jersey, they call that an offer you can't refuse.
    Train the dog, the ribbons will take care of themselves.

  2. #2
    Senior Member WaterDogRem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    SLC, UT
    Posts
    305

    Default

    In legal research I conducted in the past, it's very clear the EPA isn't concerned about the science behind issues.

    Funny how catalytic converters became mandatory to convert truly toxic emissions into safe carbon dioxide. But now since autos have basically totally eliminated those toxic elements and all that's left after converting is carbon dioxide, they must go after Carbon Dioxide. If Carbon Dioxide was so dangerous, then why did they mandate catalytic converters?

  3. #3
    Senior Member Franco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Lafayette, La.
    Posts
    10,674

    Default

    The energy producing state will stand for none of this nonsense!

    We will not let our socialistic federal government destroy our states, our heritage nor our economies.
    It's such a shame that in the USA, defending Liberty has become such a heroic deed.

Similar Threads

  1. Need for stricter EPA emissions?
    By Roger Perry in forum POTUS Place - For those who talk Politics in the Gallery!
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-24-2009, 11:24 AM
  2. EPA Concludes that greenhouse gases are a danger to public health
    By Sabireley in forum POTUS Place - For those who talk Politics in the Gallery!
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-19-2009, 05:00 PM
  3. Raised Standards
    By KwickLabs in forum RTF - Retriever Training Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-26-2009, 09:55 AM
  4. What are your standards
    By trog in forum RTF - Retriever Training Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-10-2008, 08:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •