A nice article about Dubya

[dnf777]

As one of 25million Veterans and the father of another in our Nation of 300 million citizens, I personally take great offense to the senseless posting quoted above on this day that was set aside to honor all Veterans.

As another one of the 25 million veterans, and the husband of one, I take great offense the the senseless taking of offense to the senseless JOKE that was directed at Hew.

Believe me, if Hew took offense (and it takes more than that!) he would be the first to let me know in a very clever way.

[WindyCreek]

As another one of the 25 million veterans, and the husband of one, I take great offense the the senseless taking of offense to the senseless JOKE that was directed at Hew.

Believe me, if Hew took offense (and it takes more than that!) he would be the first to let me know in a very clever way.

It isn't whether he took offense, I did. I left out part of our heritage, I am also the husband of a Veteran as well. Between us we represent 46 years (and still counting) combined service to our Nation.

Happy Veterans Day and thank both you and your husband for your service, that is sincere and in no way sarcasm.

[dnf777]

NOW you've done it! I really take offense to you thinking I have a husband! I'm happily, heterosexually married to a hot babe who could fill out army polyester green like nobody's business!

Have a good one my friend...lets save all our "offense" for the jerks that would harm our troops. They're the ones who deserve it!

[road kill]

NOW you've done it! I really take offense to you thinking I have a husband! I'm happily, heterosexually married to a hot babe who could fill out army polyester green like nobody's business!

Have a good one my friend...lets save all our "offense" for the jerks that would harm our troops. They're the ones who deserve it!

You mean the radical Islamic Terrorists??
The ones now identified by the left in America as "Conservative Islamists??"

[code3retrievers]

You mean the radical Islamic Terrorists??
The ones now identified by the left in America as "Conservative Islamists??"

Interesting! One of our local papers referred to the terrorists with just those words (conservative islamists) the other day. Is this some type of Obama talking point?

[dnf777]

You mean the radical Islamic Terrorists??
The ones now identified by the left in America as "Conservative Islamists??"

Call them what you want, we both know who they are.

As for the "conservative Islamists", its just the progressives doing to the term "conservative" what the conservatives did to the term "liberal" in the 90s. Its brand association, and very effective when it catches hold. Ask any "progressive".

[Hew]

Read 'em then decided to do a little googling.

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/6/5/23212/82795

Seems the majority of hits on Hillbuzz come from wealthy, conservative, well educated, middle-aged white women. An interesting demographic for a blog purporting to be gay Hillary supporters. They seem now to have shifted to Palin. Dino's? Troll?

The internet is a wonderful thing. You can find almost anything you want.

Go do a google. There's some differing opinions about this blog. Decide for yourself.

JD

LOL. Nice work Detective JDog.

As of now, 161 people have read this thread and what you wrote. 154 of them are relatively wealthy and conservative. Applying your above logic, that means that you obviously can't be a Liberal's Liberal.

It's a couple of Democrat gay dude's opinions. They're not trying to win an Edward R. Murrow Award for Investigative Journalism. Agree with them or don't. I do appreciate you taking the time to read the articles, though. Maybe they softened your THC-addled heart.

[Gerry Clinchy]

Seems the majority of hits on Hillbuzz come from wealthy, conservative, well educated, middle-aged white women. An interesting demographic for a blog purporting to be gay Hillary supporters.

Is there a reason to suspect that this demographic is any less intelligent or thoughtful than any other demographic? Perhaps the fact that they read this blog is an indication of open minds willing to listen to other perspectives.

I note that the referenced URL was dated June 2008 ... during the heat of the campaign.

[JDogger]

The tone of the articles on GWB are in the same tone as all of the blog. Gay? Yes. Conservative? Yes. Why they have the self-label of life-long democrats I have no idea. Maybe identity blur as well as gender blur.
The reason I thought the demographic interesting was because it was no surprise. Nothing to do with any comment on intelligence.
If you choose to believe that the two GWB pieces come from a couple of now apologetic gay democrat dudes, so be it. I do not.

JD

[Hoosier]

The tone of the articles on GWB are in the same tone as all of the blog. Gay? Yes. Conservative? Yes. Why they have the self-label of life-long democrats I have no idea. Maybe identity blur as well as gender blur.
The reason I thought the demographic interesting was because it was no surprise. Nothing to do with any comment on intelligence.
If you choose to believe that the two GWB pieces come a couple of now apologetic gay democrat dudes, so be it. I do not.

JD

This post seems a little homophobic, and coming from the far left at that.