I generally stay out of anything having to do with Al Gore since he is not a scientist and adds only to the politics of global warming, not the science (much like everyone on FoxNews, and all members of the RW blogosphere). But, llest someone actually believe that he has been less than present over the last three months, this is yesterday's op ed by Gore in the NY Times:
We Can't Wish Away Climate Change February 27, 2010
"It would be an enormous relief if the recent attacks on the science of global warming actually indicated that we do not face an unimaginable calamity requiring large-scale, preventive measures to protect human civilization as we know it."
"Of course, we would still need to deal with the national security risks of our growing dependence on a global oil market dominated by dwindling reserves in the most unstable region of the world, and the economic risks of sending hundreds of billions of dollars a year overseas in return for that oil. And we would still trail China in the race to develop smart grids, fast trains, solar power, wind, geothermal and other renewable sources of energy — the most important sources of new jobs in the 21st century."
"But what a burden would be lifted! We would no longer have to worry that our grandchildren would one day look back on us as a criminal generation that had selfishly and blithely ignored clear warnings that their fate was in our hands. We could instead celebrate the naysayers who had doggedly persisted in proving that every major National Academy of Sciences report on climate change had simply made a huge mistake."
[full piece at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/op...er=rss&emc=rss]
And, of course, as FoxNews pretends that recent snowfalls contradict evidence of warmng in some manner, we have news like this from Alaska (http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...956932,00.html) where evidence suggests that satellite images have significantly understated the degree of ice loss.