BUMFACE raised the taxes on tobbaco products!!!!!!!!!!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
BUMFACE raised the taxes on tobbaco products!!!!!!!!!!
"For everyone to whom much is given, of him shall much be required." -- Luke 12:48
Raven - Moneybird's Black Magic Marker***
(Esprit's Power Play x Trumarc's Lean Cuisine)
Mick - Moneybird's Jumpin' Jack Flash***
(Clubmead's Road Warrior x Oakdale Whitewater Devil Dog)
Peerless - Moneybird's Sole Survivor
(Two River's Lucky Willie x Moneybird's Black Magic Marker)
"For everyone to whom much is given, of him shall much be required." -- Luke 12:48
Raven - Moneybird's Black Magic Marker***
(Esprit's Power Play x Trumarc's Lean Cuisine)
Mick - Moneybird's Jumpin' Jack Flash***
(Clubmead's Road Warrior x Oakdale Whitewater Devil Dog)
Peerless - Moneybird's Sole Survivor
(Two River's Lucky Willie x Moneybird's Black Magic Marker)
Tell me how an administration can spend printed and borrowed money without having to deal with the devil later?
And, how would you lable a President that wants people that can afford Health Insurance to pay for those that can't?
I think one would have to be blind not to see the financial chaos that will result from Obama's policies. However, when we face financial armageddon, unlike those drinking the Obama kool-aide, I'll be prepared!
Where do we go without great leaders for the defense of our liberties? Who will defend our right to live our lives _as we chose_ without others taking that from us? The answer is, as it should be, no one. We are the defense of our rights and should always remember that. Libertarian blogger
Beyond sounding like a curse, I'm not even sure I know what this means. I think he wants to establish universal health insurance. No secret has been made of that fact. I think he believes in having a social safety net as has every Democrat beginning with FDR. I don't equate any of that with socialism or anti-Americanism.
Actually, I suspect he will tax them about the same amount that Reagan did, or dramatically less than in almost any developed country in the world. The primary tax will not be one passed by Obama. It will be the one passed by Bush and the Republicans in Congress in 2001 and 2003. Those cuts called for tax increases beginning next year. Are you suggesting that Obama is responsible for that failure? The Republicans passed those tax increases because they could not justify losing more revenues to make the tax cuts passed seven years ago permanent. Instead, they made the cuts greater each year and then eliminated them. The chicken has now come home to roost and it is carrying the flag of the GOP. Anyone who would extend those tax cuts without first solving the rest of our deficit is fiscally insane.
Unfortunately, I think Obama has continued down the same profligate path as his predecessor. When it comes to deficit management, he looks too much like a Republican for my taste, running up deficits in a manner that would have made Reagan and Bush proud. Unfortunately, part of the solution to the deficit will probably demand a 25-35% reduction in military spending along with comparable cuts in all other discretionary spending. I suspect that the best case for entitlement spending, which is almost entirely a function of Medicare and Social Security, is to balance future benefits and revenues. That requires actions equivalent to either a 10% reduction in benefits over time or a 10% increase in revenues. It makes no difference in the present since these programs now generate a surplus.
Actually, I think the rights you are talking about are the rights that we all have to be considered innocent absent a proof of guilt. That is the right of all people, citizens or not, who are subject to our justice system. In the absence of such protections, the only difference between a terrorist and a civilian is the word of an accuser who may have his own agenda.
Do you actually believe he woke up one morning and said "What can I do to destroy the best medical system in the world?" If you are going to call ours the best system in the world, you might want to start off by defining your terms of reference.
I suspect that you are right. I also believe that there will be no solution that does not involve higher taxes because I do not know any responsible group that has any strategy for closing the deficit based solely on spending cuts that our electorate is willing to tolerate. The reality is that Reagan and Bush slashed taxes while increasing spending to keep "the base" happy. So far, Obama has done nothing to make the situation better. However, the tea party crowd is asking for more of the same: lower taxes, more spending for all that they like (which includes Medicare and social security), and less for the mythical unwashed hordes that must be eating our lunch. Unfortunately, when you go to the budget you find that the hordes eating our lunch are the same people complaining about the bill.
Last edited by YardleyLabs; 03-04-2010 at 03:07 PM.
Give us what you want, but you wouldn't (or couldn't) answer Yardley's questions. Why not? Yet ANOTHER example of diversion and avoidance of answering reasonable questions and debate.
Go ahead, call me some names or attach more labels, I'm fully prepared and anticipating the typical response, as you demonstrated above! This pattern is getting old...
God Bless PFC Jamie Harkness. The US Army's newest PFC, but still our neighbor's little girl!
Beyond sounding like a curse, I'm not even sure I know what this means. I think he wants to establish universal health insurance. No secret has been made of that fact. I think he believes in having a social safety net as has every Democrat beginning with FDR. I don't equate any of that with socialism or anti-Americanism.
What Obama is proposing is that for those that can’t afford to pay for Health Ins. , will get it for free! You don’t equate that with being a Socialist?
Actually, I suspect he will tax them about the same amount that Reagan did, or dramatically less than in almost any developed country in the world. The primary tax will not be one passed by Obama. It will be the one passed by Bush and the Republicans in Congress in 2001 and 2003. Those cuts called for tax increases beginning next year. Are you suggesting that Obama is responsible for that failure? The Republicans passed those tax increases because they could not justify losing more revenues to make the tax cuts passed seven years ago permanent. Instead, they made the cuts greater each year and then eliminated them. The chicken has now come home to roost and it is carrying the flag of the GOP. Anyone who would extend those tax cuts without first solving the rest of our deficit is fiscally insane.
Tax them the same? We are talking about facing 16 Trillion in debt! We either reign in spending, cut taxes for businesses and leave Gov run Healthcare, Cap and Tax and all the other foolish ideas in the dumpster!
Unfortunately, I think Obama has continued down the same profligate path as his predecessor. When it comes to deficit management, he looks too much like a Republican for my taste, running up deficits in a manner that would have made Reagan and Bush proud. Unfortunately, part of the solution to the deficit will probably demand a 25-35% reduction in military spending along with comparable cuts in all other discretionary spending. I suspect that the best case for entitlement spending, which is almost entirely a function of Medicare and Social Security, is to balance future benefits and revenues. That requires actions equivalent to either a 10% reduction in benefits over time or a 10% increase in revenues. It makes no difference in the present since these programs now generate a surplus.
We all agree Bush43 started the spending mess, that’s not the solution! Forget Dem or Rep, think about the consequences we will have to deal with! We are going to have to suck it up for several years. I know that’s not what the voters want to hear but, it’s the truth. Just look how our government suckered us into bailing out the Investment Banks! Those crooks walked with BILLIONS of our tax dollars!!! The Federal Government is out of control! That’s the problem, they’ve lost touch with reality.
Actually, I think the rights you are talking about are the rights that we all have to be considered innocent absent a proof of guilt. That is the right of all people, citizens or not, who are subject to our justice system. In the absence of such protections, the only difference between a terrorist and a civilian is the word of an accuser who may have his own agenda.
Terrorist should be handled by Military Tribunals. What are YOU going to say when Eric Holder’s circus fails to get convictions in Criminal Court?
Do you actually believe he woke up one morning and said "What can I do to destroy the best medical system in the world?" If you are going to call ours the best system in the world, you might want to start off by defining your terms of reference.
He sure wants to pass his multi-TRILLION dollar Healthcare reform! Pelosi saying it will create jobs. Yea, government jobs! She and Reid, and the rest of the White House gang make the American people look foolish.
I suspect that you are right. I also believe that there will be no solution that does not involve higher taxes because I do not know any responsible group that has any strategy for closing the deficit based solely on spending cuts that our electorate is willing to tolerate. The reality is that Reagan and Bush slashed taxes while increasing spending to keep "the base" happy. So far, Obama has done nothing to make the situation better. However, the tea party crowd is asking for more of the same: lower taxes, more spending for all that they like (which includes Medicare and social security), and less for the mythical unwashed hordes that must be eating our lunch. Unfortunately, when you go to the budget you find that the hordes eating our lunch are the same people complaining about the bill.
We need to clean up DC! Whoever serves has to know they are accountable. We’ve trusted these Bozos long enough and it is the voters fault. Let us learn from our mistakes and keep the Feds on a short leach!
Last edited by Franco; 03-04-2010 at 07:28 PM.
Where do we go without great leaders for the defense of our liberties? Who will defend our right to live our lives _as we chose_ without others taking that from us? The answer is, as it should be, no one. We are the defense of our rights and should always remember that. Libertarian blogger
Well the DUMMS think the people are stupid.
They increased the tobacco tax claiming that it would pay for their massive expansion of that KID insurance junk. Nothing more than socialism and redistribution of wealth. The increase in tobacco taxes will fall well short of this. Hundreds of thousands of people would need to START smoking in order to pay for that latest form of welfare.
It flew under the radar because it was a tobacco tax.
Everyone will pay in the end or our deficit will get a massive increase.
The tobacco increase does NOT pay for this welfare program!!!!
All BUMFACE want to do is trash this county. He is a socialist. He wants those of us that actually pay INCOME taxes to pay for everyone else. He can go to hell, and is committing treason!!!! He should be charged as such and when convicted receive the strongest penalty!!!!!!!!!!