The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Outdoor Media
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Senator wants FCC to shut down Fox and MSNBC

  1. #1
    Senior Member BonMallari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    LV/CenTex/Idaho
    Posts
    12,585

    Default Senator wants FCC to shut down Fox and MSNBC

    Senator Rockefeller wants both Fox and MSNBC shut down by the FCC....well thats fair and balanced

    cant wait to see how this is received by both stations..since I dont watch PMSNBC those of you on the left of center will have to tell me if Maddow/Olbermann comment on his request...

    and yes I know the FCC doesnt control cable news content

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...est=latestnews
    All my Exes live in Texas

    Quote Originally Posted by lanse brown View Post
    A few things that I learned still ring true. "Lanse when you get a gift, say thank you and walk away. When you get a screwing walk away. You are going to get a lot more screwings than gifts"

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BonMallari View Post
    Senator Rockefeller wants both Fox and MSNBC shut down by the FCC....well thats fair and balanced

    cant wait to see how this is received by both stations..since I dont watch PMSNBC those of you on the left of center will have to tell me if Maddow/Olbermann comment on his request...

    and yes I know the FCC doesnt control cable news content

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...est=latestnews
    Well I can tell you Ed Schultz couldn't shut up about it on the radio today. I say close them all down!

  3. #3
    Senior Member BrianW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Athol, North Idaho
    Posts
    885

    Default

    Sure, why not? Let Jay & his elitist buds get back to business as usual without any interference from The People they're actually supposed to be representing. It must be really tough to cut your political deals over steaks & cigars when you've got stacks of letters, servers full of e-mails & answering machines full of messages from constituents who know what's going on these days.
    After all, that's how great-granddaddy did it and look how much influence he had! Then, after they shut down Fox & friends (pun intended), they can get to work on that annoying Internet thing with all the tweets, & blogs and such that let the whole world know what's going on! The Senate is supposed to be about decorum, and tradition and "my esteemed friend, the Senator from..." .

    Certainly, We, The People should just "trust" all of these progressives in office, right Deppity? They're obviously so much smarter than the rest of us and if they didn't have their agenda broadcast daily over cable news, we could all go back to the good ol' days when Cronkite told us what they thought we needed to know every night and then we all watched "Gunsmoke", "Perry Mason", "The Red Skelton Show", "I Love Lucy" etc. We really don't need to know about Landrieu's "Louisiana Purchase" sale of her vote, and "ethically challenged Charlie" Rangel's problems and so on and so on.

    I'm sure they'd just love it if the uninformed, unwashed masses of the "Silent Majority" went back to being silent!
    "It's not that government is inherently stupid, although that's a debatable question."
    Rand Paul CPAC speech 2011

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791
    ________________________________________
    Proud partner of (HR) WR SR Brian's 44Magnum Monster
    co-owned by HR Rianne's 2nd Chance Hurricane Rebel

  4. #4
    Senior Member Ken Bora's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Burlington, Vermont
    Posts
    11,360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BonMallari View Post
    Senator Rockefeller wants both Fox and MSNBC shut down

    Of course he does! Donít you remember wanting to pound the crap out of your little brother every time he went a tattling on whatever activities you may or may not have been doing with your buddies out behind the tractor shed?
    Nobody likes being told on but we need to know what the Senators are doing behind the shed.






    .
    "So what is big is not always the Trout nor the Deer but the chance, the being there. And what is full is not necessarily the creel nor the freezer, but the memory." ~ Aldo Leopold

    "The Greatest Obstacle to Discovery is not Ignorance -- It is the Illusion of Knowledge" ~ Daniel Boorstin

  5. #5
    Senior Member menmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrianW View Post
    Sure, why not? Let Jay & his elitist buds get back to business as usual without any interference from The People they're actually supposed to be representing. It must be really tough to cut your political deals over steaks & cigars when you've got stacks of letters, servers full of e-mails & answering machines full of messages from constituents who know what's going on these days.
    After all, that's how great-granddaddy did it and look how much influence he had! Then, after they shut down Fox & friends (pun intended), they can get to work on that annoying Internet thing with all the tweets, & blogs and such that let the whole world know what's going on! The Senate is supposed to be about decorum, and tradition and "my esteemed friend, the Senator from..." .

    Certainly, We, The People should just "trust" all of these progressives in office, right Deppity? They're obviously so much smarter than the rest of us and if they didn't have their agenda broadcast daily over cable news, we could all go back to the good ol' days when Cronkite told us what they thought we needed to know every night and then we all watched "Gunsmoke", "Perry Mason", "The Red Skelton Show", "I Love Lucy" etc. We really don't need to know about Landrieu's "Louisiana Purchase" sale of her vote, and "ethically challenged Charlie" Rangel's problems and so on and so on.

    I'm sure they'd just love it if the uninformed, unwashed masses of the "Silent Majority" went back to being silent!
    The problem is they are not silent but still uninformed.

  6. #6
    Senior Member BrianW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Athol, North Idaho
    Posts
    885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sambo View Post
    The problem is they are not silent but still uninformed.
    Do you feel that, overall, The People are more or less informed about the issues of the day than in the 60's & 70's, or even '85 (when Jay first started his Senate career), when all we had were the networks & newspapers?
    "It's not that government is inherently stupid, although that's a debatable question."
    Rand Paul CPAC speech 2011

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791
    ________________________________________
    Proud partner of (HR) WR SR Brian's 44Magnum Monster
    co-owned by HR Rianne's 2nd Chance Hurricane Rebel

  7. #7
    Senior Member BrianW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Athol, North Idaho
    Posts
    885

    Default

    The part that really got me, in Jay's little diatribe, is that he really thinks (or at least pretends well) that this would be a service to us, all wrapped up in a nice litle "slimmed down cable package" to save people money. Aw, ain't that sweet!
    Tell you what, I'm all grown up now and I don't need Uncle Rocky deciding what's good for me or not. I'll decide what cable/satellite service/channels I want or not AND what & when I'll watch, thanks to the remote & DVR.
    "It's not that government is inherently stupid, although that's a debatable question."
    Rand Paul CPAC speech 2011

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791
    ________________________________________
    Proud partner of (HR) WR SR Brian's 44Magnum Monster
    co-owned by HR Rianne's 2nd Chance Hurricane Rebel

  8. #8
    Senior Member menmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrianW View Post
    Do you feel that, overall, The People are more or less informed about the issues of the day than in the 60's & 70's, or even '85 (when Jay first started his Senate career), when all we had were the networks & newspapers?
    The problem today is the spin is out of control. With cable news and the internet, there is so much misinformation. Furthermore, the internet and cable news sell watered down information that is spun to the uninformed with the pretense of informing them. Just like the financial news, someone is always pushing an agenda. The only value in these shows is the ticker tape, the rest is just agenda moving. American's would be better off if they went back to watching Hawaii 5 o, and I love Lucy

  9. #9
    Senior Member Tim Thomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Madisonville, Texas
    Posts
    291

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sambo View Post
    The problem today is the spin is out of control. With cable news and the internet, there is so much misinformation. Furthermore, the internet and cable news sell watered down information that is spun to the uninformed with the pretense of informing them. Just like the financial news, someone is always pushing an agenda. The only value in these shows is the ticker tape, the rest is just agenda moving. American's would be better off if they went back to watching Hawaii 5 o, and I love Lucy
    I'm not quite sure if your reference to "spin" is intended to brand all news org's or just Fox.....your past posts would tend to suggest Fox is the only one handing out misinformation. Either way, I tend to think that we're better off with the deluge of info, most with a twist of opinion, but still info. It does appear to have drawn in a more youthful audience than past and just as if the delivery was from car salesman of long ago, we inherently grow wise to the rhetoric. Worst case scenario...it has caused more interest in at least what is going on and perhaps, in the process, folks will become more educated on the history and foundation of this great country. So, watch your Hawaii Five-0 or Lucy reruns....me, I'm keeping my eye on the ball.
    You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it

  10. #10
    Senior Member cotts135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Watertown NY
    Posts
    697

    Default

    Yep, just what we need, a politician telling us what we should watch in our own homes. As Ken said, this is only a move in his own self interest and that of his buddies in Congress.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •