The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Outdoor Media
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Say hello to China

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,245

    Default

    Isn't there some rule that defense spending can't be used for the general budget? If so wouldn't that make spending on infastructure not plausible?

  2. #12
    Senior Member T. Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    1,022

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dnf777 View Post
    Just saw the Chinese have committed $32.5 billion to establish a high-speed rail system, connecting their major cities. We have Amtrack, operating on 19thCentury-era technology tracks.
    Hate to burst the bubble, but California also just committed money to develop a high speed rail system. The differences though are obvious.

    http://www.kcra.com/money/25999927/detail.html

    California allocated $4.3 billion to develop a 65 mile segment in the central valley. A major part of this is Federal stimulus money. However politics as usual plays an important role, as the bill authorizing the expenditure requires that the first segment be built in the central valley (low population area) rather than developing the current Amtrak systems already in place such as the Capitol Corridor (Auburn to Sacramento to San Francisco) or San Diego to LA. And that the project must be approved and funding authorized by the state by the end of the year! Further the cities being connected in the central valley plan are very small with the only city of size being Fresno. The southern terminus is a town of Corcoran, where most of the inhabitants are prisoners at the local correction facility. So you can be happy that we will be happily spending $4.3 billion of your tax payer money to build a 65 mile stretch of high speed rail line connecting what is essentially a truck stop off highway 99, to the correctional facility in Corcoran (total population of about 130k), for a mere $66 million per mile.

    "Engineers explained the route was the best choice of three studied, given the limited funding and a federal requirement that the segment be useable whether or not the entire 800-mile system is built. They said the route will allow the track to connect to an existing freight rail line used by Amtrak. The authority is under a tight deadline to pick a route and enter a funding agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration by the end of the year."

    Want to bet that China will build something useful (like connecting major metropolitan areas) at a much better cost?
    Last edited by T. Mac; 12-03-2010 at 07:14 PM.

  3. #13

    Default

    Funny how the president not only will not get our troops out of Iraq but he escalated our troops in Afghanistan. Boy we need a new president.If only he thought that was the right thing to do. Maybe he knows the same thing G.W knew.We are loosing more troops now then ever funny how that is not news under this pres. I will assume the troops still need to be there.Father of a trooper in Iraq regards.

  4. #14
    Senior Member dnf777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Western Pa
    Posts
    6,161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. Mac View Post
    Hate to burst the bubble, but California also just committed money to develop a high speed rail system. The differences though are obvious.

    http://www.kcra.com/money/25999927/detail.html

    California allocated $4.3 billion to develop a 65 mile segment in the central valley. A major part of this is Federal stimulus money. However politics as usual plays an important role, as the bill authorizing the expenditure requires that the first segment be built in the central valley (low population area) rather than developing the current Amtrak systems already in place such as the Capitol Corridor (Auburn to Sacramento to San Francisco) or San Diego to LA. And that the project must be approved and funding authorized by the state by the end of the year! Further the cities being connected in the central valley plan are very small with the only city of size being Fresno. The southern terminus is a town of Corcoran, where most of the inhabitants are prisoners at the local correction facility. So you can be happy that we will be happily spending $4.3 billion of your tax payer money to build a 65 mile stretch of high speed rail line connecting what is essentially a truck stop off highway 99, to the correctional facility in Corcoran (total population of about 130k), for a mere $66 million per mile.

    "Engineers explained the route was the best choice of three studied, given the limited funding and a federal requirement that the segment be useable whether or not the entire 800-mile system is built. They said the route will allow the track to connect to an existing freight rail line used by Amtrak. The authority is under a tight deadline to pick a route and enter a funding agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration by the end of the year."

    Want to bet that China will build something useful (like connecting major metropolitan areas) at a much better cost?

    Sad, very sad. As a country, we'd better pull our heads out of our A$$es and straighten our priorities. Fiscal responsibility and education better be moved way up, or we all better buy our Rosetta Stone chinese edition soon. It makes me sick when I see other countries like China taking common sense, sound, forward looking steps....while we splash around in a pool of partisan crap and bickering....going NOWHERE. The republicans had 8 years and showed they could do NOTHING. Now the dems have been much more efficient in their demonstration of incompetence, taking only two years to show more nothingness. We better find a party or person who can actually LEAD this country where it needs to go, rather than focus on the next election cycle.
    God Bless PFC Jamie Harkness. The US Army's newest PFC, but still our neighbor's little girl!

  5. #15
    Senior Member Jay Dufour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Pine Grove, Louisiana, 70453
    Posts
    2,409

    Default

    I just saw that badboy on FOX....300 MPH ! You can say that again DNF !

  6. #16
    Senior Member dnf777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Western Pa
    Posts
    6,161

    Default

    One big problem with high-speed trains is security. With planes, you need to secure them at their point of departure and check what gets on them. (and that's proving to be quite a task)

    With a train, every inch of track, every remote bridge, is a potential target for a terrorist attack. All it would take is a welding truck and a little wedge of angle iron, and you got a 300mph coffin.

    I suspect the cost of security, when taken into account, renders trains prohibitively expensive for now.
    God Bless PFC Jamie Harkness. The US Army's newest PFC, but still our neighbor's little girl!

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by road kill View Post
    There is a reason these projects are getting canceled in WI.

    We don't have the money!!!!

    Spending money we DON'T have on something we DON'T need shows "Absolutely no foresight!"

    Chairman Mao regards...........


    RK
    Of course, that logic also applies to our military industrial complex.

  8. #18
    Senior Member zeus3925's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    West Twin Cities Metro, MN
    Posts
    2,150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marvin S View Post
    But look at the guy everyone is chasing, while I don't advocate his tendency to anarchy, you have to admit he is one bright guy for his ideas!!!! If you haven't been watching the news I speak of wikileaks & the fact he has no formal education .
    You think this his social isolation may have something to do with is lack of conscience? We want him essentially for espionage, Sweden wants him for rape. Lock the little buzzard up and pitch the key into the sea. This dude is a classic anti-social animal.
    Zeus

    I don't want to feed an ugly dog!

  9. #19
    Senior Member zeus3925's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    West Twin Cities Metro, MN
    Posts
    2,150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marvin S View Post

    Privatize, anyone?
    The big conservative mantra is to privatize. That doesn't always end up providing efficient service. If you are in our neighborhood on Thursdays, you will witness no less than six big diesel garbage trucks picking up trash and another picking up recyclables. All for the 14 houses in just our cul-de-sac. I have lived in town where just one city truck did everything.

    Another good example of privatization gone awry is the privatization of National Forest campgrounds. One concessionaire took over all the USFS campgrounds in a national forest in Colorado. Four years ago, he was was charging $26 just to have a half hour picnic. That with facilities built with tax money.
    Zeus

    I don't want to feed an ugly dog!

  10. #20
    Senior Member T. Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    1,022

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dnf777 View Post
    Sad, very sad. As a country, we'd better pull our heads out of our A$$es and straighten our priorities. Fiscal responsibility and education better be moved way up, or we all better buy our Rosetta Stone chinese edition soon. It makes me sick when I see other countries like China taking common sense, sound, forward looking steps....while we splash around in a pool of partisan crap and bickering....going NOWHERE. The republicans had 8 years and showed they could do NOTHING. Now the dems have been much more efficient in their demonstration of incompetence, taking only two years to show more nothingness. We better find a party or person who can actually LEAD this country where it needs to go, rather than focus on the next election cycle.
    The sad part is that the cost for the 65 mile segment is project to be $4.3 B. The 65 mile portion they are building is fairly flat ag land, while the final projected project is 800 miles which will include some fairly steep mountain grades, as well as terrain with a lot more river/creek crossings. If the construction costs were kept the same, 800 miles would cost $53B. But as costs will surely be double or more with the added bridges and mountain crossings for the other sections, this project could easily reach the $100B range! And then when you consider that it will still be over 100 miles from the Nevada border or 400 miles from the Oregon border, both very mountainous routes, to continue this on to become an interstate mode of transportation will cost unfathomable amounts.
    Last edited by T. Mac; 12-03-2010 at 11:17 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •