drug testing

[mjh345]

HAHAHA... Healy some of your posts of late have worried me but PC or not, I ***SO**** agree with this one. Everyone agrees the gene pool needs a little chlorine and this would be a good start towards halting the dumbing down of America. If you can't feed em don't breed em.

Hey there Reardon, don't worry about me. I have never abandoned the cause of conservatism and fiscal responsibility. The purported leaders of "Republican Conservatism" have abandoned me IMHO.
They talk a good game, but delivery on that rhetoric has been sorely lacking for way too long.
Trust me if they made me Supreme Ruler of these United States for a couple of years I suspect you would LOVE 99% of the changes I would make. Hell I'd even ask you to be my Vice Supreme Ruler, but I doubt if playing 2nd string is in your makeup. LOL

If I can find your phone # I'll give you a call after the Holidays slow down. I really enjoyed chatting with you and so admire your ability to cut through the BS, and get to the meat of the issue.
I think I'm going to breed my bitch shortly and it will be my first and I'd love to get your input

Still love ya girl
Have a great New Year!!

[BonMallari]

Bon you are usually one of the more rational posters on here;.....but this one really misses the boat.

Advocating Temporary contraception for people who can't provide for themselves and there already existing offspring, in no way can be equated with Hitlers program

Temporary contraception is one thing, I have no problem with that, actually think its a good idea....now sterilization of a person ramps that up to a whole new level...are there cases where someone should be sterilized..Absolutely..but then we begin a slippery slope as to who get to decide, as is the case with a previous poster and their dilemma with a handicapped family member, they probably should have been allowed to take preventative measures

[dnf777]

Temporary contraception is one thing, I have no problem with that, actually think its a good idea....

Where were you when I suggested norplant or depo for all welfare recipients??

[BonMallari]

Where were you when I suggested norplant or depo for all welfare recipients??

probably waterfowl hunting or dog training in Idaho...


Honestly I never saw/read that thread

[david gibson]

Where were you when I suggested norplant or depo for all welfare recipients??

you recommend only fixing women - but not reversible V's for men?

[gman0046]

The people we're talking about told Warthogs how to procreate.

[dnf777]

you recommend only fixing women - but not reversible V's for men?

Give all the norplant and depo to men you want. Won't do any good.


Vasectomy reversibility is only marginally successful. Cessation of norplant or depo is 100%.

"fixing" implies permanent sterilization. That is inaccurate and misleading.

[Blackstone]

i was a truck mechanic for 40 yrs.before injuries forced retirement and as such is had random drug tests. this got me thinking don't you think the police and politicians should have to also.what about people on welfare and those poor souls that couldn't find jobs for 99 weeks and had to extend unemployment to feed their families,any one i missed?

I agree that anyone that can endanger the wellfare of the general public should receive drug tests. As far as some of the others, I'm not sure how productive it would be. I would bet a significant number of people on welfare and unemployment are not using drugs. Also, how are we going to pay for all that testing? That sounds like a whole new goverment agency and a lot of tax dollars to me.

[Marvin S]

I agree that anyone that can endanger the wellfare of the general public should receive drug tests. As far as some of the others, I'm not sure how productive it would be. I would bet a significant number of people on welfare and unemployment are not using drugs. Also, how are we going to pay for all that testing? That sounds like a whole new goverment agency and a lot of tax dollars to me.

IMO, the deterrent effect would minimize the number of tests required, just like the welfare rolls slim down when it becomes workfare.

[RedlegHunter]

I agree that anyone that can endanger the wellfare of the general public should receive drug tests. As far as some of the others, I'm not sure how productive it would be. I would bet a significant number of people on welfare and unemployment are not using drugs. Also, how are we going to pay for all that testing? That sounds like a whole new goverment agency and a lot of tax dollars to me.

Random testing would not be that expensive relatively speaking compared to the amount of money being provided through current entitlement programs and the deterrent factor alone would probably be considerable. There will always be some who will violate testing or not and they should be weeded out of the programs. Could even go with a 2 or 3 strikes rule instead of 1 and done. The bigger issue would be the determining what would be screened for in the tests; just THC and Opiates or even some of the more popular illegal prescription drugs as well?