The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Outdoor Media
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Feinstein Asks President To Tighten Import Restrictions On Semi-Automatic Rifles

  1. #1
    Senior Member BrianW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Athol, North Idaho
    Posts
    885

    Default Feinstein Asks President To Tighten Import Restrictions On Semi-Automatic Rifles

    NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS ALERT
    Vol. 18, No. 5 02/04/11

    On Tuesday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) sent a letter to President Barack Obama, urging him to have the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives review its interpretation of the federal law that provides for the importation of firearms "generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes." Adopting a narrower interpretation of the law would, Feinstein claimed, help reduce violence in Mexico and the United States . As the Supreme Court said in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms primarily for self-defense. This means the "sporting purposes" limitation imposed by the Gun Control Act of 1968 is constitutionally suspect, to put it mildly. What makes matters worse is that BATFE repeatedly misinterprets the law to serve political ends, which is precisely what Feinstein has in mind.


    The text:



    "I write to urge you to review enforcement of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) provision, 18 U.S. Code Section 925(d)(3), which prohibits the importation of firearms except those that are “generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.” Previous Administrations have used this authority to limit the importation of military-style assault firearms, and it could once again be a helpful tool in preventing the gun trafficking that is fueling the horrific gun violence in Mexico, the Southwest border region, and many cities and towns across our nation.

    Since December 2006, more than 30,000 people have been killed in Mexico in drug-related violence. Every day, there are reports of ruthless and brutal gun murders as Mexican drug trafficking organizations (DTOs) fight for control of smuggling routes and terrorize anyone who might get in their way. The DTOs have killed mayors, judges, and other officials who have tried to stop the carnage. They have even targeted young people, murdering 14 teenagers at a birthday party in Ciudad Juarez in October of last year.


    Regrettably, firearms trafficked from the United States help fuel the violence in Mexico. Of the firearms recovered by the Government of Mexico and traced through ATF in the past 4 years, more than 50,000 were manufactured in, or imported into, the United States prior to being recovered in Mexico. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and other federal, state and local law enforcement are working to stop this gun trafficking and related violence, but they need additional help. The Administration recently took an important step forward with ATF’s initiative to collect information on multiple sales of semi-automatic assault rifles from Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) in California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. I applaud you for this initiative. However, much more must be done.


    Under the GCA, the Administration has the authority to prohibit the importation of non-sporting firearms. In 1989, in response to growing drug gang violence, the ATF under President George H.W. Bush denied applications to import a series of semiautomatic rifles that it found were designed and intended to be particularly suitable for combat rather than sporting applications. Similarly, in 1997, President Clinton used this authority and ordered ATF to conduct an expedited review to determine whether modified semiautomatic assault-type rifles were properly importable under the statutory sporting purposes test. In April 1998, ATF determined that rifles with the ability to accept a detachable large capacity military magazine “are not generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes and are therefore not importable.”


    Since the Clinton Administration’s efforts, the GCA’s prohibition against non-sporting firearms has not been aggressively enforced, and many military-style, non-sporting rifles have flowed into the United States civilian market. Some of the rifles are cheap AK-type variants from former Eastern bloc countries, while others are more expensive, high-tech weapons. All of them, however, share military-style characteristics that should make them ineligible for import. Furthermore, it appears that some importers are bringing in rifle parts and reassembling them with a small number of domestically manufactured components. This practice has gone unchecked, despite Section 922 (r) of the GCA, which prohibits using imported parts to assemble any semiautomatic rifle or any shotgun which is identical to any rifle or shotgun prohibited from importation under 18 U.S. Code Section 925(d)(3).


    I urge you to review enforcement of the GCA and take any regulatory steps necessary to stop the both the importation of all military-style, non-sporting firearms, and the assembly of those firearms from imported parts. We must ensure that law enforcement has all the necessary resources and tools needed to stop the gun violence that is taking a deadly toll in Mexico and in our country. I look forward to working with you toward that goal. Thank you for your attention to this urgent issue."



    Here again the GCA's seek to restrict our rights based on the activities of criminals, primarily from another country, and somehow try to make the specious argument that we should only be "allowed" to defend ourselves with firearms primarily suited for sporting purposes. Maybe like an Anshutz Model 1907 Diane?!?

    In lieu of banning guns, putting up signs warning citizens not to travel in certain areas of their own country and prosecuting Border Patrol agents trying to do their jobs, wouldn't it be nice for a change to hear/read "We must ensure that our citizens have all the necessary resources and tools needed to protect themselves from the gun violence that is taking a deadly toll in Mexico and in our country."

    Unfortunately I'll be as blue as these emoticons before that will happen.
    "It's not that government is inherently stupid, although that's a debatable question."
    Rand Paul CPAC speech 2011

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791
    ________________________________________
    Proud partner of (HR) WR SR Brian's 44Magnum Monster
    co-owned by HR Rianne's 2nd Chance Hurricane Rebel

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Grantville GA
    Posts
    2,334

    Default

    How naive. To think that limiting importation of the same type guns that are produced here will somehow reduce guns in the hands of criminals...
    It's proven every day that law abiding citizens don't commit gun-related crimes. Even gun crimes by the mentally challenged can be foreseen way in advance, which we should control). It's proven every day that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens reduces crime.

    The old saying if guns are controlled that only criminals will have guns still applies.
    David Didier, GA

  3. #3
    Senior Member BrianW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Athol, North Idaho
    Posts
    885

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Granddaddy View Post
    How naive.
    No David, Sen. Feinstein may be a lot of things; a sociopathic, hypocritical, hoplophobic, pathologically lying bitch to name a few (imo), but on the issue of guns at least, she is certainly not naive!

    This would be "banning" w/o "a ban". Similar to EPA enforcing "cap & trade" carbon regulations with no legislation signed into law.
    "I never voted for/signed any legislation banning guns!" And they would be correct.
    A deceptive maneuver meant to mislead the public into thinking the Admin is doing "something" about the border violence when it would do nothing of the sort.

    Why doesn't Feinstein write a letter to PBO asking him to authorize funds for the Guard & a few Hellfire armed Predators to root out the observation/listening posts that the "DTO's" have in Cochise County AZ and likely elsewhere in OUR country if she really wants to something about the violence? Why should the Sheriff's SWAT team have to go up against foriegn nationals?

    Because these invaders might become future Democrat voters after CIR gets shoved through?
    "It's not that government is inherently stupid, although that's a debatable question."
    Rand Paul CPAC speech 2011

    I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791
    ________________________________________
    Proud partner of (HR) WR SR Brian's 44Magnum Monster
    co-owned by HR Rianne's 2nd Chance Hurricane Rebel

  4. #4
    Senior Member subroc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Dover, New Hampshire
    Posts
    2,112

    Default

    this is what democrats support, accept and vote for when they vote for democrats, a full frontal assault on the second amendment
    subroc

    Article [I.]
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
    Article [II.]
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,345

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrianW View Post
    No David, Sen. Feinstein may be a lot of things; a sociopathic, hypocritical, hoplophobic, pathologically lying bitch to name a few (imo), but on the issue of guns at least, she is certainly not naive!

    This would be "banning" w/o "a ban". Similar to EPA enforcing "cap & trade" carbon regulations with no legislation signed into law.
    "I never voted for/signed any legislation banning guns!" And they would be correct.
    A deceptive maneuver meant to mislead the public into thinking the Admin is doing "something" about the border violence when it would do nothing of the sort.

    Why doesn't Feinstein write a letter to PBO asking him to authorize funds for the Guard & a few Hellfire armed Predators to root out the observation/listening posts that the "DTO's" have in Cochise County AZ and likely elsewhere in OUR country if she really wants to something about the violence? Why should the Sheriff's SWAT team have to go up against foriegn nationals?

    Because these invaders might become future Democrat voters after CIR gets shoved through?
    Exactly an end run on our 2nd A rights

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •