Gingrich reverses stand on Libya

[code3retrievers]

Thanks, that's it.


I would like to issue a challenge:


Could ONE republican come forward and say that Newt flip-flopped, and demonstrated severe hypocrisy, based upon HIS OWN VIDEO EVIDENCE???

Just one, and I'll shut up.

Why do you feel the need to issue a challenge? Are you really that small? Yes Newt changed his policy (flip flopped if it makes you feel better)

Do you think we are going to run around criticizing those that align with us politically or throw them under the bus when they make one or more stupid statements.

It must make you feel better about yourself when we don't agree with the leadership. Did all Republicans agree with Bush's spending? No, most did not agree. Did most want prescription drug coverage. No again.

You see we all have our own opinions and exercise our rights. Is there much I agree with Obama on? Can't think of anything right now. He does not align with me politically so I feel free to make comments about his stupid policies that are ruining this country.

Now I would like to see you keep your promise to shut up. (or will you flip flop)

[huntinman]

Thanks, that's it.


I would like to issue a challenge:


Could ONE republican come forward and say that Newt flip-flopped, and demonstrated severe hypocrisy, based upon HIS OWN VIDEO EVIDENCE???

Just one, and I'll shut up.

I've been gone all day and have missed this enticing debate. But, for the promise in your last sentence, I will admit to anything! Yes, he is a flip-flopping sob... Now shut the hell up!

[M&K's Retrievers]

Thanks, that's it.


I would like to issue a challenge:


Could ONE republican come forward and say that Newt flip-flopped, and demonstrated severe hypocrisy, based upon HIS OWN VIDEO EVIDENCE???

Just one, and I'll shut up.

Newt, who I don't care for, flip-floped. So what?

Are you really gonna shut up?

I doubt it regards,

[BrianW]

But I thought "having the courage to change your mind" was a definitive "presidential quality" in this day & age.
Kind of like standing up for your pastor of 20 years, then throwing him under the bus a couple of weeks later, when he ceases to be a useful tool & becomes a liability.

It's not just the "methods" that some of us have a problem with, it's the "methodology" (or lack of, as the case may be) that PBO's using.
If an NFZ is "the right thing to do" as some assert, isn't it the right thing whether or not the SecCoun/NATO, etc approves it? All they can really do is make it "more right".
Obama has helped to set the world on fire with his "rise up" oratory and now with the UN's ICRtoP kicking in, http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.o...-cote-d-ivoire
- if "protective actions of peaceful democratic expressions" is warranted for one group of protesters, where does it stop?
Imo, this is a really bad precedent that is going to turn around and bite us- hard. The fact that this is in support of Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb backed revolutionaries should give serious pause as well.

[dnf777]

I will shut up, just after I admit that you guys were big enough to say that. Thank you. I call Obama when he does stupid things, and now I know you guys can too. Well, stan is still putting out decoys.....

But a promise is a promise, so 777 is "over and out" on this thread!