the debates would be fun. it would be great to see her in a debate as a republican during the primaries moderated by FOX, National Review or maybe even Rush Limbaugh.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
the debates would be fun. it would be great to see her in a debate as a republican during the primaries moderated by FOX, National Review or maybe even Rush Limbaugh.
Last edited by subroc; 04-13-2011 at 06:18 AM.
subroc
Article [I.]
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Article [II.]
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
stan b
SR-HR-UH-Field of Dreams Mr. Elvis
"Don't give up.....don't ever give up!!!"
Jimmy V
__________________________________________________ ____________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Well, we are assuming the Republican Party would accept her. We are assuming the Republican Party would allow her to debate issues as a Republican. Limbaugh wouldn't need to be moderate to be a moderator at a republican debate. I doubt the Republican primaries goal is to find a good moderate. I believe their goal is to find a Republican that can win.
subroc
Article [I.]
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Article [II.]
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.