
Originally Posted by
IowaBayDog
Well the stock answer used to be that torture didn't work for getting valuable information. Guess that myth is busted....
Executing terrorists without a trial is OK, Waterboarding a terrorist to gain information and letting them live, not OK. Doesn't seem too logical to me. I guess they could have asked UBL if he wanted the bullet or to be waterboarded repeatedly for 6 months and live in prison the rest of his life and see what the terrorists think is the worse option. Personally I think 6 months of waterboarding then the bullet to the head would have been better but I'm ok with how it went down too.
The information obtained was after the waterboarding stopped.
Waterboarding Timeline Shows Torture Did Not Lead To Getting Bin Laden
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was reportedly waterboarded 183 times, but that took place years before he was at Gitmo, and did not produce information leading to bin Laden’s demise. By the time the name of the courier’s name, Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, was learned, it was 2007, and that was years after waterboarding and rendering to black sites had stopped.
http://www.alan.com/2011/05/03/water...ing-bin-laden/
Torture, according to the United Nations Convention Against Torture (an advisory measure of the UN General Assembly) is:
...any act by which severe
pain or
suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him, or a third person, information or a
confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or
intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in, or incidental to, lawful sanctions. --UN Convention Against Torture
[1]
Torture is prohibited under
international law and the domestic laws of most countries in the 21st century. It is considered to be a violation of
human rights, and is declared to be unacceptable by Article 5 of the
UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Signatories of the
Third Geneva Convention and
Fourth Geneva Convention officially agree not to torture prisoners in armed conflicts. Torture is also prohibited by the
United Nations Convention Against Torture, which has been ratified by 147 states.
[2]