I do believe that is possible. Some pros do not compete. Some talented amateurs do not have the grounds or money to go all the way. I think the measure of a "good trainer" is one that improves the dog he has to start with. If it is a talented dog and all the elements are in place, then of course he should title. If the dog has less natural talent or comes packing a load of issues, success can be defined by acceptable performance of the job he is asked to do.
If titles or ribbons are the only rewards for playing this damn game, I am truly wasting my time! I do it for the joy of working with my own dogs. When one of them gets something right that we have been working on, reward enough! I have one that has been to the line five times in the Q. The old boy is 7. We have not made it to the fourth series in an AKC trial yet. I had a blast each and every time, kicked myself in the butt for all my greenhorn mistakes, went home happy and continued to work on it. So yes, I am extremely happy for the guy and dog this thread started for. Go get 'em and have fun. That someone is doing that is all the encouragement I need.
Not all of us prove our "quest for excellence" by throwing hundreds of thousands of $$ or dogs at a national title.











Reply With Quote



