The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy Dogs Afield Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Gun Dog Broker
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 64 of 64

Thread: Hiroshima VS. Detroit

  1. #61
    Senior Member road kill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New Berlin, WI
    Posts
    9,476

    Default




    State laying groundwork for managed bankruptcy for Detroit

    Daniel Howes

    Even as the state Treasury prepares to begin another financial review of Detroit's books, a plan is being solidified in the governor's office that would guide Michigan's largest city through what is being called a managed bankruptcy.

    The working concept, still evolving, assumes that the state's financial review would find severe financial distress in Detroit, that Mayor Dave Bing and City Council would be unable to push through overdue restructuring, and that the process would culminate in appointment of an emergency financial manager under Public Act 72.

    The case would be filed under Chapter 9 of the federal bankruptcy code, according to two ranking sources familiar with the situation, following efforts to reach prenegotiated settlements with as many key creditors — unions, vendors and pension funds among them — as possible before any filing.

    "Clearly, we will always try to do that," one source familiar with the situation said in an interview Thursday. "You can move on a much more expedited basis if you can demonstrate that your cash is running out" — as Detroit clearly is with each passing week.

    The evolving bankruptcy scenario is a clear signal that Gov. Rick Snyder and Treasurer Andy Dillon have lost confidence in the ability of the mayor, his management team and council to honor their commitments under the eight-month-old consent agreement with the state, or to make any meaningful progress on restructuring.

    Contingency planning in Lansing for a possible Chapter 9 bankruptcy filing is not likely to be popular inside council chambers or the Mayor's Office. But it's the responsible and necessary thing to do, whatever the protests from the elected officials whose denial and self-delusion are hastening the arrival of a reckoning they can no longer avoid.

    The goal of a managed bankruptcy is to streamline the protracted process by minimizing the chaos, uncertainty, delay and steep costs associated with Chapter 9. It would be the largest municipal bankruptcy in the nation's history, an unambiguous symbol of the city's epic failure and a chance for a fresh start.

    "That's exactly the strategy you should do," said Douglas Bernstein, managing partner of Plunkett Cooney's banking, bankruptcy and creditor rights group. "You're never going to be able to get all the unions — and all you need — to agree in advance, not a chance. You try to do it outside of bankruptcy or you drop it in. It's prudent, too. It's very prudent."

    In bankruptcy, pre-packaged deals arrange settlements with all creditors in advance of a filing that is usually followed quickly with a plan of reorganization (called "plan of adjustment" in Chapter 9). A pre-negotiated deal akin to the one being explored in the Governor's Office would reach settlements with some creditors and leave others to be litigated in court.

    A Chapter 9 filing for Detroit may be increasingly likely given the dysfunction and infantile posturing atop City Hall. But bankruptcy is not yet certain, provided three obstacles can be removed or settled outside of court: pending litigation designed to slow the process; pension debt of $1.4 billion and $440 million in outstanding swap contracts; and liabilities for retiree health care.

    Planning for a possible bankruptcy of Detroit should not be surprising coming from Snyder, an accountant-turned-CEO, and Dillon, a former investment banker. Both possess keen financial minds, strategic savvy and a habit for planning further ahead than most politicians, particularly the elected officials in Detroit flailing from one crisis to the next.

    In anticipation of Detroit's financial collapse, for example, Dillon retained an investment banking firm in December 2010 — before taking office — to advise the Treasury on ways to restructure Detroit's balance sheet, reduce its liabilities and return the city's credit rating to investment grade.

    City Council, by comparison, is blocking the mayor's effort to hire a local law firm, Miller Canfield, citing conflicts of interest. Nor has the city, likely about a month away from Snyder appointing an emergency financial manager, showed any inkling of forward planning and retained bankruptcy counsel.

    It should, because there is no president of the United States or consortium of banks coming to the rescue. Both Public Act 72, the existing emergency financial manager law, and revised legislation that passed the House this week enable an emergency financial manager and his counsel to negotiate settlements with creditors in advance of a Chapter 9 filing.

    Under Public Act 72, an emergency financial manager cannot move to abandon the city's financial workout plan in favor of bankruptcy until 180 days have passed. But the timeline to Chapter 9 filing can be accelerated if the city is in danger of running out of cash.

    Still, bankruptcy for Detroit would require the governor to first appoint an emergency financial manager. The appointee would be charged with devising a financial plan, making it public and beginning the effort to execute it — unless the city's meager cash hoard runs out first.

    It probably will, which is why the governor and his treasurer are taking their jobs seriously and planning for the worst. Someone has to.


    From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/2...#ixzz2EO8FL2Kr
    Amazing..............
    stan b

    SR-HR-UH-Field of Dreams Mr. Elvis


    "Don't give up.....don't ever give up!!!"
    Jimmy V
    __________________________________________________ ____________________

    "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

    Ralph Waldo Emerson

  2. #62
    Senior Member menmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,723

    Default

    Need to clean it up....best thing that could happen

  3. #63
    Senior Member zeus3925's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    West Twin Cities Metro, MN
    Posts
    1,538

    Default

    [QUOTE=caryalsobrook;1041665]
    Quote Originally Posted by zeus3925 View Post
    By the way, Cary, your assertion that the TVA states are now the center of auto production is not borne by facts. In terms of employment, Michigan is number one and Ohio is number two. The traditional car and parts production is still dominated by the North.

    http://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iagauto.htm[/QUOT
    I could be wrong but I have read that Michigan is #4 in the production of autos and Tn is #1. Maybe that is wrong. What I do know is that Nissan based in smyrna Tn. continues to increase production and new hires. Same for toyota, mercedes, vw, all based in the South. Not just yesterday and today, but for last year and the year before and before that. None needed a bailout. They did not need a bailout because they have maintained quality and kept their labor costs at a level that they can remain competitive(a responsibility of management, I might add). Looking at Detroit, one might surmise that is not the case there. In any event to say that the auto industry is dominated by the north is like saying a school with the large football stadium(tennessee?)dominates even though they have a losing team(and the fans are not showing up.

    PS Interesting that you should associate TVA with the states. You might check the history of TVA. The Gov. seized far more land via imminant domain at very little cost and have been selling the excess land at huge profits. Talk about the good, the bad, and the ugly, you could also have a college degree when studying TVA.
    Here is another link. Michigan is still #1.

    http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2...s-workers.html

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/12/map.us.auto/index.html

    There are many reasons to a manufacturing facility along with labor cost. Important is the skill level of the work force. Also a consideration is the costs and availability of materials needed in manufacturing. Another is energy cost. (Thanks to TVA that provides a inexpensive source.) Other considerations are access to markets. Cost of real estate is another factor.
    Last edited by zeus3925; 12-07-2012 at 07:59 PM.
    Sarge

    I don't want to feed an ugly dog!

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,071

    Default

    [QUOTE=zeus3925;1042056]
    Quote Originally Posted by caryalsobrook View Post

    Here is another link. Michigan is still #1.

    http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2...s-workers.html

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/12/map.us.auto/index.html

    There are many reasons to a manufacturing facility along with labor cost. Important is the skill level of the work force. Also a consideration is the costs and availability of materials needed in manufacturing. Another is energy cost. (Thanks to TVA that provides a inexpensive source.) Other considerations are access to markets. Cost of real estate is another factor.
    You are right and I was wrong. Some organization rates Tennessee the #1 auto state(whatever that means). I never said that labor was the only factor in Mich.'s lack of competiveness. Certainly there are many factors. as for TVA, it's electrical rates are not nearly as low as in the past. While at one time they had the lowest rates in the country, I don't believe that to be true today. You mention TVA as an advantage in the production of cars but fail to mention such things as the Fantom Freight Law requiring freight charges to be comuted as if the steel was shipped from Pittsburg, no matter where it was made, resulting in Mich and Ohio paying less in freight on steel than Tn would have. Not once have I blamed labor, on the contrary, labor can do nothing without the consent of mgmt. I remember when the UAW claimed that job security was the major point of bargaining and touted the new contract as "guaranteeing job security for it's members". Surely the union reps knes that job security goes only as far as the fiscal integrity of the company(barring Gov. bailouts).

    There are many things that unions advocate that resrict comppetiveness but there are some that actually improve competiveness, long term labor contracts guaranteeing stability of labor costs over a period of time is an example. If you are to succeed, you must compete. If you cannot compete successfully, you fail

    .
    I do know one thing, barring gov. bailouts, the future of the auto industry in the south looks far better than in Mich. and ohio. It may not stay that way because evidently Mich appears ready to try something different than the ways that have gotten them in the shape they are.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •