The RetrieverTraining.Net Forums The Retriever Academy
Total Retriever Training with Mike Lardy
Hawkeye Media Gunners Up Tritronics Outdoor Media
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Liberal thinking?

  1. #1
    Senior Member achiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Enid, OK
    Posts
    2,076

    Default Liberal thinking?

    I've not seen one suggested piece of legislation that would have stopped most, if not all, of the recent mass shootings. I understand that when something like Sandy Hook happens that people feel helpless and want to do something but that happened in a state with already very restrictive gun laws. So why continue to argue points that wouldn't have mattered? Why ignore facts and vote emotion? Why push for laws that only effect good, decent, law abiding folks? Do they honestly believe that someone willing to commit the heinous crime of murder cares about breaking a gun law?
    Before someone says "clip size" please understand that the only thing a smaller magazine would have done is made the shooter reload more often. In a "gun free zone" nobody can do anything in the short time it takes someone to change one out.
    Making ammo more expensive is one that really pisses me off. The idea that a criminal set on killing would be deterred because he had to spend more money to get ammo is stupid. So the one that gets hurt is the recreational shooter that likes to go to the range. It's already incredibly expensive to shoot. Less practice then means more people with legal guns that have less experience using them. Smart.
    Anyway I could go on and on but I won't. I just don't get it.
    "The thing I admire about the rat tail is that it takes commitment. It's not like one day you just decide you want one, you have to grow out that bad boy and you have to repeatedly convince the hairdresser to trust you because it's a great idea."

  2. #2
    Senior Member Golddogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by achiro View Post
    I've not seen one suggested piece of legislation that would have stopped most, if not all, of the recent mass shootings. I understand that when something like Sandy Hook happens that people feel helpless and want to do something but that happened in a state with already very restrictive gun laws. So why continue to argue points that wouldn't have mattered? Why ignore facts and vote emotion? Why push for laws that only effect good, decent, law abiding folks? Do they honestly believe that someone willing to commit the heinous crime of murder cares about breaking a gun law?
    Before someone says "clip size" please understand that the only thing a smaller magazine would have done is made the shooter reload more often. In a "gun free zone" nobody can do anything in the short time it takes someone to change one out.
    Making ammo more expensive is one that really pisses me off. The idea that a criminal set on killing would be deterred because he had to spend more money to get ammo is stupid. So the one that gets hurt is the recreational shooter that likes to go to the range. It's already incredibly expensive to shoot. Less practice then means more people with legal guns that have less experience using them. Smart.
    Anyway I could go on and on but I won't. I just don't get it.
    Interestingly the 2 biggest mass murders in our country were not even comitted with firearms and no punitive legislation followed :

    The World Trade Center

    Oklahoma
    Never trust a dog to watch your food!

  3. #3
    Senior Member HPL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Coastal Bend of Texas
    Posts
    2,902

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Golddogs View Post
    Interestingly the 2 biggest mass murders in our country were not even comitted with firearms and no punitive legislation followed :

    The World Trade Center

    Oklahoma

    WHAT?!! I would have to disagree with this. Ever heard of the Patriot Act?
    Any doctrine that weakens personal responsibility for judgment and for action helps create the attitudes that welcome and support the totalitarian state.
    (John Dewey)

    Associate yourself with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for 'tis better to be alone than in bad company.
    (George Washington)

    Gig'em Aggies!! BTCO'77HOO t.u.!!

    www.HughLieck.photoshelter.com

  4. #4
    Senior Member Golddogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HPL View Post
    WHAT?!! I would have to disagree with this. Ever heard of the Patriot Act?
    Which is a wide ranging act.

    I am refering more to legislation tied directly to a specific : i.e. we really added nothing but a bit more or tighter security in airports and you have to sign for fertilizer now but no additional taxes or punitive restrictions were added. Might take a bit longer to clear security at the airport, but I find it not much different than pre 911.

    They did not restrict how often you could fly or where.
    Never trust a dog to watch your food!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •