In 1961, I can't remember the exact number of elements that was supposed to comprise the universe but I do know that there are more today. Since these theories have had to be modified,does that mean that they are both more complicated than the THEORY of Relativity?
Maybe we could keep it simple. When does human life begin? When does it end? Simple? Maybe, but we STILL don't have a FACTUAL answer. When I went to college, one was taught to QUESTION, to CHALLENGE, to BE SKEPTICAL. That was the basic precept of science. Now today we talk about "junk science", "end of discussion", theory is now to be taken as FACT, discussion not allowed.
As to income redistribution, do you not call corporate welfare(solar and wind production and purchasing, ect), food stamps, student loans, housing subsities, heating subsities, ect, income redistribution? You even have a thread talking about the distribution of income. In a market based capitolistic system, people have the right to FREELY exchange their doods and serivces. Income is just a medium of exchange to facilitate that RIGHT. Yet you seem to speak of it as if income distribution is something other than that.