The trial is complete. The judges have narrowed their decision for picking a winner to two dogs. Both dogs have run a wonderful trial and both have performance merits which standout above the other. Dog 1 has been virtually perfect on 6 tough marks, no hunts. The marks of no other dog comes close to dog 1 except dog 2. Dog 2 has been near perfect on 5 marks with only one small under the arc hunt (so small you might rate it as comparable to dog 1 on that bird) in the 1st series but dog 2 has a rather large hunt on the go-bird flyer shot in heavy cover in the 4th (both dog 1 & dog 2 encountered the flyer to be downed in essentially the same spot on the go-bird flyer). It should be noted that dog 2 ran relatively late with lots of duck feathers blown over the area of fall and beyond while dog 1 ran several dogs earlier but with similar wind direction. Dog 1's blinds were just OK, the land blind work of dog 1 was middle of the pack, with the water blind of dog 1 poor but apparently good enough to get to the 4th series. Dog 2's blinds were near the top of the field in both the 2nd and 3rd series.
From the information you have been provided who is your winner & why?