Question.....whenever there's a judges thread regarding what handlers can or cannot do, at some point the word "intimidation" is used. Someone will say that if a handler does ABC that they will judge that as intimidation, and that's always how it is, the poster defines intimidation by the action of the handler. Judges are given quite a bit of leeway it seems when it comes to judging intimidation which I have no qualms with. But I do have a question.... what is intimidation? Is it the action of the handler.....or is it the response from the dog to that action?