My knee-jerk reaction: I'd vote to not accept the entries (does this mean I don't have to worry 'bout being on any more FTCs? :mrgreen: ).
BUT! being so new to the FT game, I really have nothing to lose yet.
However, if others on the committee made a convincing argument for voting to accept them, I reckon I'd be open-minded. Can't think of a good argument right off the top of my head, other than it would likely be a big ol' PITA, and I don't have much faith that AKC would back our play. Hopefully some more thoughtful folks will post up their opinions. It's definitely a thorny issue.
Tina - who's often wondered if the rejected person would call the FTC's hand....would they leave it alone and just run the open (a tacit acknowledgement of guilt, perhaps?) or would they fight it, regardless of their guilt, gambling that it would be too tough to prove they were ineligible :?: