Joined
·
6,607 Posts
To date, I have had three All Age Judging assignments - each with great people, all of whom are considered to be very good judges - Gary Ahlgren, Judy Powers, and Skip Cope.
I thought I would pass on some things that I learned from judging with them.
First, on each occasion, my co-judge and I spent a couple of hours just talking about what we liked and didn't in dog work, and in tests. Then we discussed what our parameters would be for line manners and the honor.
Second, when we got out in the field, we set up two or three different options - so that we would have a test ready no matter what the wind conditions were like. We marked potential problems for the FT committee to address the next day. We checked to make sure the whistles could be heard and the handlers seen. We marked gun stations and where we wanted the bird to fall.
Third, at 6 the next morning, we got up, had breakfast, talked about the wind, then went out in the field, got our workers set up. Got test throws, talked about no -birds. When 8 am rolled around, we were ready for a test dog.
Fourth, we decided on a cadence by which we would call the bird - which we would not vary (many times wild dogs get more time than calm ones, because the judges watch the dogs and forget to call the birds). We decided again what we would consider a no-bird. As the dogs ran, when we saw something unusual - we would talk with one another
What did you think about that mouth?
I don't like this dog's voice off the line? I think we should keep an eye on it in the next series.
Throughout the tests, we would be talking about what we considered superb work, what we considered abysmal work, and the work we thought we needed to look at more closely. At the end of each series, I don't think we spent more than 10 minutes on call backs. Because along the way, we had already decided who would definitely be back, and who would definitely not return - all we had to discuss was the dogs on the bubble.
By the same token, as we worked our way through the field, we would continue to discuss the merits of the work. As a consequence, by the end of the trial, we had really gotten to know what the other thought about the dog work. On none of those three occasions did it take any time to decide upon a winner. And even where we disagreed initially on the remaining places, because we had communicated along the way, it did not take long for us to sort through the work.
So, here's what I learned from these folks:
1. Communicate, communicate, communicate
2. Nothing beats hard work and preparation
3. Do your judging as you go
Ted
I thought I would pass on some things that I learned from judging with them.
First, on each occasion, my co-judge and I spent a couple of hours just talking about what we liked and didn't in dog work, and in tests. Then we discussed what our parameters would be for line manners and the honor.
Second, when we got out in the field, we set up two or three different options - so that we would have a test ready no matter what the wind conditions were like. We marked potential problems for the FT committee to address the next day. We checked to make sure the whistles could be heard and the handlers seen. We marked gun stations and where we wanted the bird to fall.
Third, at 6 the next morning, we got up, had breakfast, talked about the wind, then went out in the field, got our workers set up. Got test throws, talked about no -birds. When 8 am rolled around, we were ready for a test dog.
Fourth, we decided on a cadence by which we would call the bird - which we would not vary (many times wild dogs get more time than calm ones, because the judges watch the dogs and forget to call the birds). We decided again what we would consider a no-bird. As the dogs ran, when we saw something unusual - we would talk with one another
What did you think about that mouth?
I don't like this dog's voice off the line? I think we should keep an eye on it in the next series.
Throughout the tests, we would be talking about what we considered superb work, what we considered abysmal work, and the work we thought we needed to look at more closely. At the end of each series, I don't think we spent more than 10 minutes on call backs. Because along the way, we had already decided who would definitely be back, and who would definitely not return - all we had to discuss was the dogs on the bubble.
By the same token, as we worked our way through the field, we would continue to discuss the merits of the work. As a consequence, by the end of the trial, we had really gotten to know what the other thought about the dog work. On none of those three occasions did it take any time to decide upon a winner. And even where we disagreed initially on the remaining places, because we had communicated along the way, it did not take long for us to sort through the work.
So, here's what I learned from these folks:
1. Communicate, communicate, communicate
2. Nothing beats hard work and preparation
3. Do your judging as you go
Ted